Chen R S, Tsai C H, Lu C S
Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mov Disord. 1995 Sep;10(5):556-61. doi: 10.1002/mds.870100505.
We studied the inhibition of median H-reflexes by conditioning stimuli on the radial nerve in 13 patients with writer's cramp, eight of the simple type and five of the dystonic type, and in 14 normal volunteers. The patients and controls were right-handed, and their right arms were studied. Asymptomatic left arms were also studied in nine of 13 patients. In the control group we identified three periods of inhibition, with maximum peaks at conditioning-test intervals of 0 ms (41 +/- 17%), 20 ms (40 +/- 13%), and 100 ms (36 +/- 20%). In the patient group, the amplitudes of inhibition of these three periods in both arms were significantly less than those in the control group. However, there were no significant differences in the amplitudes of inhibition of these three periods between symptomatic and asymptomatic arms. There were also no significant differences between simple and dystonic writer's cramps. Our results indicate that the attenuation of reciprocal inhibition was present not only in symptomatic arms but also in asymptomatic arms of patients with writer's cramp. The defect of reciprocal inhibition in the asymptomatic hand has never been documented. We suggest that the preexistent electrophysiological abnormality may provide an explanation for the development of hand cramp after shifted writing.
我们研究了13例书写痉挛患者(其中8例为单纯型,5例为肌张力障碍型)以及14名正常志愿者,通过对桡神经施加条件刺激来抑制正中H反射。患者和对照组均为右利手,研究其右臂。13例患者中的9例还对无症状的左臂进行了研究。在对照组中,我们确定了三个抑制期,在条件刺激 - 测试间隔为0毫秒(41±17%)、20毫秒(40±13%)和100毫秒(36±20%)时出现最大峰值。在患者组中,双臂这三个时期的抑制幅度均显著低于对照组。然而,有症状和无症状手臂在这三个时期的抑制幅度没有显著差异。单纯型和肌张力障碍型书写痉挛之间也没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,交互抑制减弱不仅存在于书写痉挛患者有症状的手臂中,也存在于无症状的手臂中。无症状手部的交互抑制缺陷从未有过记录。我们认为,预先存在的电生理异常可能为书写姿势改变后手部痉挛的发生提供一种解释。