Wright D M, Serpell M G, Baxter J N, O'Dwyer P J
University Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1169-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00210921.
Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum has been shown to produce respiratory and hemodynamic changes due to both CO2 absorption and the effects of increased intraperitoneal pressure. We have measured the blood gas, end-tidal CO2, and hemodynamic changes produced during extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation (n = 22). These have been compared with the changes occurring during CO2 pneumoperitoneum (n = 11) under standardized anesthetic conditions. The changes observed during pneumoperitoneum were consistent with previous descriptions. There was a median rise in arterial pCO2 of 1 kPa over the first 15-20 min, followed by a second phase of only gradual change. There was also an increase in mean arterial pressure of 18 mmHg during the insufflation period. We have found a similar magnitude of rise in arterial pCO2 during extraperitoneal insufflation (median 0.83 kPa), but the rate of rise was significantly slower (P < 0.05). In addition, there was no change in the mean arterial pressure during extraperitoneal insufflation. Our results suggest that extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation may be safer than CO2 pneumoperitoneum in patients with preexisting cardiorespiratory disease.
二氧化碳气腹已被证明会由于二氧化碳吸收以及腹腔内压力升高的影响而产生呼吸和血流动力学变化。我们测量了腹膜外二氧化碳注入过程中(n = 22)产生的血气、呼气末二氧化碳和血流动力学变化。这些变化已与在标准化麻醉条件下二氧化碳气腹过程中(n = 11)发生的变化进行了比较。气腹过程中观察到的变化与先前的描述一致。在最初的15 - 20分钟内,动脉血二氧化碳分压(pCO2)中位数升高1 kPa,随后是仅缓慢变化的第二阶段。在注入期间平均动脉压也升高了18 mmHg。我们发现在腹膜外注入期间动脉pCO2升高幅度相似(中位数0.83 kPa),但升高速率明显较慢(P < 0.05)。此外,腹膜外注入期间平均动脉压没有变化。我们的结果表明,对于已有心肺疾病的患者,腹膜外二氧化碳注入可能比二氧化碳气腹更安全。