• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病态肥胖患者发生切口疝的风险高于类固醇依赖患者,使用筋膜前聚丙烯补片复发率低。

Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh.

作者信息

Sugerman H J, Kellum J M, Reines H D, DeMaria E J, Newsome H H, Lowry J W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80078-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80078-6
PMID:8554156
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a serious complication of abdominal surgery. We compared incisional hernia frequency following gastric bypass (GBP) for morbid obesity versus total abdominal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. A prefascial polypropylene mesh repair was also evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients had midline incisions, xiphoid to umbilicus in GBP patients and midepigastrium to pubis in IPAA patients. Fascia were closed with running No. 2 polyglycolic acid suture. Ninety-eight patients underwent prefascial polypropylene mesh repair; 80 were GBP patients, 46 had 1 previous repair, and 17 had 2 to 9 previous repairs (6 with properitoneal mesh).

RESULTS

Incisional hernia occurred in 20% (198/968) of GBP patients (19% without versus 41% with a previous hernia, P < 0.001) versus 4% (7/171) of the IPAA patients (P < 0.001), of whom 102 (60%) were taking prednisone (32 +/- 2 mg/d) and 5 were quite obese (body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2). Additional risk factors for hernia in GBP patients included wound infection, diabetes, sleep apnea, and obesity hypoventilation. For the 98 patients who underwent prefascial polypropylene mesh repair, the mean follow-up was 20 +/- 2 months (range 6 to 104), and complications occurred in 35% of patients, including minor wound infection (12%), major wound infection (5%), seroma (5%), hematoma (3%), chronic pain (6%), and recurrent hernia (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe obesity is a greater risk factor for incisional hernia and hernia recurrence than chronic steroid use in nonobese colitis patients. A prefascial polypropylene mesh repair minimizes recurrence.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部手术的一种严重并发症。我们比较了病态肥胖患者接受胃旁路手术(GBP)与溃疡性结肠炎患者接受全腹结肠切除术及回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)后切口疝的发生率。还评估了一种筋膜前聚丙烯网片修补术。

患者与方法

所有患者均采用正中切口,GBP患者的切口从剑突至脐,IPAA患者的切口从上腹部中部至耻骨。用2号聚乙醇酸缝线连续缝合筋膜。98例患者接受了筋膜前聚丙烯网片修补术;80例为GBP患者,46例曾接受过1次修补,17例曾接受过2至9次修补(6例使用腹膜前网片)。

结果

GBP患者中20%(198/968)发生切口疝(无既往疝者为19%,有既往疝者为41%,P<0.001),而IPAA患者中为4%(7/171)(P<0.001),其中102例(60%)正在服用泼尼松(32±2mg/d),5例为极度肥胖(体重指数≥30kg/m²)。GBP患者发生疝的其他危险因素包括伤口感染、糖尿病、睡眠呼吸暂停和肥胖低通气综合征。对于接受筋膜前聚丙烯网片修补术的98例患者,平均随访时间为20±2个月(范围6至104个月),35%的患者出现并发症,包括轻度伤口感染(12%)、重度伤口感染(5%)、血清肿(5%)、血肿(3%)、慢性疼痛(6%)和复发性疝(4%)。

结论

与非肥胖结肠炎患者长期使用类固醇相比,严重肥胖是切口疝和疝复发的更大危险因素。筋膜前聚丙烯网片修补术可将复发率降至最低。

相似文献

1
Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh.病态肥胖患者发生切口疝的风险高于类固醇依赖患者,使用筋膜前聚丙烯补片复发率低。
Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80078-6.
2
[Management of large abdominal wall hernias with foreign implant materials (Gore-Tex patch)].使用异体植入材料(戈尔泰克斯补片)治疗巨大腹壁疝
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(10):879-84.
3
Adverse events, quality of life, and recurrence rates after laparoscopic adhesiolysis and recurrent incisional hernia mesh repair in patients with previous failed repairs.既往修补失败患者行腹腔镜粘连松解术及复发性切口疝补片修补术后的不良事件、生活质量和复发率
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):663-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.330. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
4
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
5
Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia.用于切口疝开放下层补片修补的重质与轻质聚丙烯补片对比研究
Eur J Med Res. 2005 Jun 22;10(6):247-53.
6
Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.腹腔镜下修复大型切口疝。
Am Surg. 2002 Jun;68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4.
7
Open preperitoneal retrofascial mesh repair for multiply recurrent ventral incisional hernias.开放腹膜前筋膜后补片修补术治疗多次复发性腹部切口疝
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Sep;203(3):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.05.297. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
8
A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.切口疝缝合修补与补片修补的比较
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603.
9
Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula.切口疝的腹膜内聚丙烯网片修补术与肠皮肤瘘无关。
Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):348-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01364.x.
10
Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia.切口疝缝合修补、聚丙烯网片修补或自体皮肤疝修补术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):50-6. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01974.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The new bridge to hernia surgery: achieving preoperative weight optimization with GLP-1 receptor agonists for abdominal wall hernia repair.通往疝气手术的新桥:使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂实现术前体重优化以进行腹壁疝修补术。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11921-z.
2
Outcomes of ventral hernia repair in patients of severe obesity: An experience from a tertiary care centre.重度肥胖患者腹疝修补术的疗效:来自三级医疗中心的经验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 1;21(3):270-275. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_292_24. Epub 2025 May 9.
3
Incisional hernia incidence following laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
腹腔镜与开腹手术切口疝发生率:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 30;29(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03347-2.
4
Postoperative Pain and Incisional Hernia of Specimen Extraction Sites for Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Periumbilical Midline Incision Versus Pfannenstiel Incision.微创直肠癌手术标本取出部位的术后疼痛与切口疝:脐周正中切口与耻骨上横切口的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2697. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082697.
5
Managing a large incisional hernia in an obese and immunosuppressed patient: A case report.肥胖且免疫抑制患者的大型切口疝处理:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Mar;128:111029. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111029. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
6
Laparoscopic or Robotically Assisted Colectomy with a Pfannenstiel Incision Reduces the Incisional Hernia Incidence.采用耻骨上横切口的腹腔镜或机器人辅助结肠切除术可降低切口疝的发生率。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):298-304. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-019. eCollection 2024.
7
GLP-1 receptor agonists are a transformative prehabilitation tool for weight loss in obese patients undergoing elective hernia repair.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂是一种变革性的术前康复工具,可帮助接受择期疝气修补术的肥胖患者减肥。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):440-447. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11308-6. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
8
Concurrent minimally invasive bariatric surgery and ventral hernia repair with mesh; Is it safe? Propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2022 MBSAQIP database.同期进行的微创减重手术与使用补片的腹疝修补术;安全吗?利用2015 - 2022年MBSAQIP数据库进行倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7544-7551. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11260-5. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
9
Innovative Approaches to Address the Technical Challenge of Hernial Sac Distension Due to Pneumoperitoneum in the Synchronous Management of Complex Hernias in Individuals With Morbid Obesity.在病态肥胖个体复杂疝的同步管理中,应对气腹导致疝囊扩张这一技术挑战的创新方法。
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59897. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an observational clinical study from a tertiary oncology referral care center in India.印度一家三级肿瘤转诊治疗中心的观察性临床研究:细胞减灭术和腹腔内热化疗患者切口疝的发生率。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 May 17;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03408-3.