Suppr超能文献

[食管癌的影像学检查:超声内镜还是计算机断层扫描?]

[Imaging of cancer of the esophagus: ultrasound-endoscopy or computed tomography?].

作者信息

Fékété F, Sauvanet A, Zins M, Berthoux L, Amouyal G

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy.

出版信息

Ann Chir. 1995;49(7):573-8; discussion 578-9.

PMID:8554267
Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study, in 100 patients who had an esophagectomy from 1987 to 1992 for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus, was to determine the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The EUS report were compared to the pathological findings for the T stage. Both EUS and CT reports were compared with surgical and pathological findings for N stage (N0/N1) and mediastinal extension. In the 100 patients, EUS accuracy for T stage was 80%; EUS was more accurate for N stage than CT (71% vs 55% respectively; p < 0.02), and as accurate as CT for mediastinal extension (86% vs 85%). In the 26 SCC estimated superficial by EUS (all passed through), EUS accuracy was 92% for T stage and 77% for the distinction between mucosal and submucosal tumours; for N stage, EUS and CT accuracies were equivalent (77% vs 81%). In the 44 SCC passed and estimated advanced by EUS, EUS accuracy for T stage was 68%; EUS was more accurate than CT for N stage (77% vs 48%, p < 0.01) and as accurate as CT for mediastinal extension (86 vs 84%). In the 30 SCC not passed by EUS, accuracies of EUS and CT were equivalent for N stage (57% vs 47%) and for mediastinal extension (73% vs 73%). This study suggests that: a) for SCC estimated superficial by EUS, EUS does not differentiate reliably mucosal from submucosal tumors and CT is useless; b) routine EUS seems unnecessary for SCC not passed through by endoscopy; c) CT is still useful in patients with advanced SCC, mainly for detection of distant metastases.

摘要

这项回顾性研究的目的是,确定1987年至1992年因胸段食管鳞状细胞癌接受食管切除术的100例患者中,内镜超声检查(EUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在食管鳞状细胞癌(SCC)术前分期中的准确性。将EUS报告与T分期的病理结果进行比较。将EUS和CT报告均与N分期(N0/N1)及纵隔侵犯的手术和病理结果进行比较。在这100例患者中,EUS对T分期的准确率为80%;EUS对N分期的准确率高于CT(分别为71%和55%;p<0.02),对纵隔侵犯的准确率与CT相当(86%和85%)。在EUS评估为表浅的26例SCC(均顺利通过)中,EUS对T分期的准确率为92%,区分黏膜和黏膜下肿瘤的准确率为77%;对于N分期,EUS和CT的准确率相当(77%和81%)。在EUS评估为进展期且顺利通过的44例SCC中,EUS对T分期的准确率为68%;EUS对N分期的准确率高于CT(77%和48%,p<0.01),对纵隔侵犯的准确率与CT相当(86%和84%)。在EUS未通过的30例SCC中,EUS和CT对N分期(57%和47%)及纵隔侵犯(73%和73%)的准确率相当。本研究表明:a)对于EUS评估为表浅的SCC,EUS无法可靠区分黏膜和黏膜下肿瘤,且CT无用;b)对于内镜未通过的SCC,常规EUS似乎不必要;c)CT对进展期SCC患者仍有用,主要用于检测远处转移。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验