Albright A L, Barry M J, Fasick M P, Janosky J
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;23(2):82-5. doi: 10.1159/000120941.
This study was performed to compare the effects of continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion (CIBI) and selective posterior rhizotomy (SPR) on upper extremity (UE) spasticity and range of motion in children with cerebral palsy. Spasticity was assessed with the Ashworth scale of muscle tone and range of motion was evaluated. Thirty-eight patients who had been treated with CIBI for at least 6 months were paired, according to pretreatment UE muscle tone and functional status, with 38 patients who had undergone SPR. The CIBI dosage had been titrated to reduce over lower extremity spasticity and improve lower extremity function, rather than to improve UE tone. The pretreatment muscle tone in the two groups was virtually identical. The UE tone of children treated with CIBI decreased from 2.07 prior to treatment to 1.66 after 1 year (p < 0.01). The tone of children treated with SPR decreased from 2.03 to 1.70 after 1 year (p = 0.005). In that group, the likelihood of a clinically significant reduction in muscle tone (one point or greater) was greater in children with a higher pretreatment UE muscle tone. There was no correlation between the percentage of posterior lumbar roots divided in SPR and the subsequent reduction in UE tone. There were no significant changes in the range of motion in any UE joint, at either 6 or 12 months, after either CIBI or SPR. We conclude that both CIBI and SPR significantly reduce UE spasticity, in addition to the previously documented reduction in lower extremity spasticity.
本研究旨在比较持续鞘内注射巴氯芬(CIBI)和选择性后根切断术(SPR)对脑瘫患儿上肢(UE)痉挛及活动范围的影响。采用Ashworth肌张力量表评估痉挛情况,并对活动范围进行评估。根据治疗前UE肌张力和功能状态,将38例接受CIBI治疗至少6个月的患者与38例接受SPR治疗的患者进行配对。CIBI的剂量已进行调整,以减轻下肢痉挛并改善下肢功能,而非改善UE肌张力。两组治疗前的肌张力基本相同。接受CIBI治疗的患儿UE肌张力从治疗前的2.07降至1年后的1.66(p < 0.01)。接受SPR治疗的患儿肌张力在1年后从2.03降至1.70(p = 0.005)。在该组中,治疗前UE肌张力较高的患儿肌张力临床显著降低(降低1分或更多)的可能性更大。SPR中后腰椎神经根切断的比例与随后UE肌张力的降低之间无相关性。在CIBI或SPR治疗后的6个月或12个月,任何UE关节的活动范围均无显著变化。我们得出结论,除了先前记录的下肢痉挛减轻外,CIBI和SPR均能显著降低UE痉挛。