Roch O G, Blunden G, Haig D J, Coker R D, Gay C
School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Portsmouth, Hampshire, England, UK.
Br J Biomed Sci. 1995 Dec;52(4):312-6.
A comparison has been made between pre-column and post-column derivatisation of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) during estimation by high-performance liquid chromatography of this toxin in groundnut meal. The effect of the use of different derivatisation reagents on the quantification of aflatoxin B2 (AFB2) has also been evaluated. Both AFB1 and AFB2 were analysed at eight levels of artificial contamination. Five replicate analyses were carried out at each level on both groundnut meal extract (acetone-water, 85:15, v/v) and extraction solvent alone. A statistical evaluation of the results gave limits of detection of 1.1 and 0.3 micrograms/kg for AFB1 and AFB2 respectively, using pre-column derivatisation compared with 1.5 and 0.8 micrograms/kg for the post-column method. Recoveries of over 90% from the spiked groundnut meal extracts were achieved for both derivatisation methods.
在通过高效液相色谱法测定花生粕中黄曲霉毒素B1(AFB1)时,对柱前衍生和柱后衍生进行了比较。还评估了使用不同衍生试剂对黄曲霉毒素B2(AFB2)定量的影响。对AFB1和AFB2均在八个水平的人工污染下进行了分析。在花生粕提取物(丙酮 - 水,85:15,v/v)和单独的提取溶剂上,对每个水平进行了五次重复分析。对结果的统计评估表明,使用柱前衍生时,AFB1和AFB2的检测限分别为1.1和0.3微克/千克,而柱后衍生法的检测限分别为1.5和0.8微克/千克。两种衍生方法从加标花生粕提取物中的回收率均超过90%。