• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的血管造影严重程度及形态学谱

Angiographic severity and morphological spectrum of coronary artery disease in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Calton R, Calton R, Dhanoa J, Jaison T M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 1995 Jul-Aug;47(4):343-8.

PMID:8557276
Abstract

Coronary angiographic profile of 75 patients (63 males and 12 females) with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and CAD was compared with 75 nondiabetic patients (63 males and 12 females) with CAD. No difference was present between the mean age (56.2 +/- 7.4 vs 56.1 +/- 7.7 years; p = NS), presenting complaints (67 unstable angina and 8 stable angina with positive TMT in both the groups) and other coronary risk factors between the two groups. Severity and diffuseness of coronary artery involvement was assessed by a coronary artery score (CAS) using the segmental distribution method for coronary artery lesions. Diabetic patients with CAD had a higher CAS (18.7 +/- 10.3) as compared to the nondiabetic patients with CAD (12.7 +/- 9.6) (p < 0.01). Diabetic patients with CAD had a higher number of TVD [43 (57.3%) vs 31 (41.3%); p < 0.01] while the DVD and SVD was not significantly different. As compared to the nondiabetic group, diabetics had a higher total number of coronary artery lesions (300 vs 200; p < 0.001), a higher lesion per patient ratio (4.0 lesions/patient vs 2.6 lesions/patient; p < 0.001), a higher number of concentric lesions, [151 (50.3%) vs 90 (45%); p < 0.01] and a higher number of multiple irregularity lesions, [36 (21%) vs 27 (9%); p < 0.05]. The diffuse involvement of vessels was not significantly different between the two groups in LAD (12.1% vs 5.3%; p = NS), LCx (14.2% vs 5.8%; p = NS) and RCA (10.5% vs 5.0%; p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

将75例非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)合并冠心病(CAD)患者(63例男性和12例女性)的冠状动脉造影特征与75例非糖尿病冠心病患者(63例男性和12例女性)进行比较。两组的平均年龄(56.2±7.4岁 vs 56.1±7.7岁;p =无统计学意义)、主诉(两组均为67例不稳定型心绞痛和8例运动试验阳性的稳定型心绞痛)及其他冠状动脉危险因素无差异。采用冠状动脉病变节段分布法通过冠状动脉评分(CAS)评估冠状动脉受累的严重程度和弥漫性。与非糖尿病冠心病患者(12.7±9.6)相比,糖尿病冠心病患者的CAS更高(18.7±10.3)(p <0.01)。糖尿病冠心病患者的严重三支血管病变数量更多[43例(57.3%) vs 31例(41.3%);p <0.01],而双支血管病变和单支血管病变无显著差异。与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病患者的冠状动脉病变总数更多(300例 vs 200例;p <0.001),每例患者的病变比例更高(4.0个病变/患者 vs 2.6个病变/患者;p <0.001),同心病变数量更多[151例(50.3%) vs 90例(45%);p <0.01],多发不规则病变数量更多[36例(21%) vs 27例(9%);p <0.05]。两组在左前降支(LAD)(12.1% vs 5.3%;p =无统计学意义)、左旋支(LCx)(14.2% vs 5.8%;p =无统计学意义)和右冠状动脉(RCA)(10.5% vs 5.0%;p =无统计学意义)的血管弥漫性受累方面无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Angiographic severity and morphological spectrum of coronary artery disease in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的血管造影严重程度及形态学谱
Indian Heart J. 1995 Jul-Aug;47(4):343-8.
2
Association of major modifiable risk factors among patients with coronary artery disease--a retrospective analysis.冠心病患者主要可改变危险因素的关联——一项回顾性分析
J Assoc Physicians India. 2004 Feb;52:103-8.
3
Diabetes mellitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization.糖尿病:即使在考虑冠状动脉疾病的程度和血运重建的益处之后,仍是不稳定型冠状动脉疾病的主要危险因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.050.
4
Detection of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病无症状患者冠状动脉疾病的检测
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
Effects of coronary artery disease and percutaneous intervention on the cardiac metabolism of nonesterified fatty acids and insulin: Implications of diabetes mellitus.冠状动脉疾病和经皮介入治疗对非酯化脂肪酸和胰岛素心脏代谢的影响:糖尿病的意义。
J Intern Med. 2009 Jun;265(6):689-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02072.x. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
6
Angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的血管造影严重程度和范围
Mymensingh Med J. 2005 Jan;14(1):32-7.
7
Influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term survival in systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.糖尿病对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术长期生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.063.
8
Novel atherogenesis markers for identification of patients with a multivessel coronary artery disease.用于识别多支冠状动脉疾病患者的新型动脉粥样硬化标志物。
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Nov;66(11):1173-80; discussion 1181-2.
9
Primary coronary intervention in diabetic octogenarians with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.老年糖尿病患者急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接冠状动脉介入治疗
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Oct;65(10):1181-6; discussion 1187-9.
10
Insulin sensitivity and the diffuseness of coronary artery disease in humans.人类胰岛素敏感性与冠状动脉疾病的弥漫性
Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Dec;115(12):1886-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomy of coronary disease in diabetic patients: an explanation for poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and potential target for intervention.糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的解剖结构:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后预后较差的原因及潜在干预靶点。
Heart. 2004 Jul;90(7):732-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021014.