Calton R, Calton R, Dhanoa J, Jaison T M
Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana.
Indian Heart J. 1995 Jul-Aug;47(4):343-8.
Coronary angiographic profile of 75 patients (63 males and 12 females) with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and CAD was compared with 75 nondiabetic patients (63 males and 12 females) with CAD. No difference was present between the mean age (56.2 +/- 7.4 vs 56.1 +/- 7.7 years; p = NS), presenting complaints (67 unstable angina and 8 stable angina with positive TMT in both the groups) and other coronary risk factors between the two groups. Severity and diffuseness of coronary artery involvement was assessed by a coronary artery score (CAS) using the segmental distribution method for coronary artery lesions. Diabetic patients with CAD had a higher CAS (18.7 +/- 10.3) as compared to the nondiabetic patients with CAD (12.7 +/- 9.6) (p < 0.01). Diabetic patients with CAD had a higher number of TVD [43 (57.3%) vs 31 (41.3%); p < 0.01] while the DVD and SVD was not significantly different. As compared to the nondiabetic group, diabetics had a higher total number of coronary artery lesions (300 vs 200; p < 0.001), a higher lesion per patient ratio (4.0 lesions/patient vs 2.6 lesions/patient; p < 0.001), a higher number of concentric lesions, [151 (50.3%) vs 90 (45%); p < 0.01] and a higher number of multiple irregularity lesions, [36 (21%) vs 27 (9%); p < 0.05]. The diffuse involvement of vessels was not significantly different between the two groups in LAD (12.1% vs 5.3%; p = NS), LCx (14.2% vs 5.8%; p = NS) and RCA (10.5% vs 5.0%; p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
将75例非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)合并冠心病(CAD)患者(63例男性和12例女性)的冠状动脉造影特征与75例非糖尿病冠心病患者(63例男性和12例女性)进行比较。两组的平均年龄(56.2±7.4岁 vs 56.1±7.7岁;p =无统计学意义)、主诉(两组均为67例不稳定型心绞痛和8例运动试验阳性的稳定型心绞痛)及其他冠状动脉危险因素无差异。采用冠状动脉病变节段分布法通过冠状动脉评分(CAS)评估冠状动脉受累的严重程度和弥漫性。与非糖尿病冠心病患者(12.7±9.6)相比,糖尿病冠心病患者的CAS更高(18.7±10.3)(p <0.01)。糖尿病冠心病患者的严重三支血管病变数量更多[43例(57.3%) vs 31例(41.3%);p <0.01],而双支血管病变和单支血管病变无显著差异。与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病患者的冠状动脉病变总数更多(300例 vs 200例;p <0.001),每例患者的病变比例更高(4.0个病变/患者 vs 2.6个病变/患者;p <0.001),同心病变数量更多[151例(50.3%) vs 90例(45%);p <0.01],多发不规则病变数量更多[36例(21%) vs 27例(9%);p <0.05]。两组在左前降支(LAD)(12.1% vs 5.3%;p =无统计学意义)、左旋支(LCx)(14.2% vs 5.8%;p =无统计学意义)和右冠状动脉(RCA)(10.5% vs 5.0%;p =无统计学意义)的血管弥漫性受累方面无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)