Stallings G, Boake C, Sherer M
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, TX 77204-5341, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Oct;17(5):706-12. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405160.
Performances of moderate and severe closed-head-injury patients were compared on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Results showed that raw scores were highly correlated between tests. There were no significant between-test differences in mean raw scores. However, standard scores calculated from existing CVLT and RAVLT norms were significantly lower on the CVLT than on the RAVLT. Furthermore, there were differences between the various RAVLT norm sets. The results indicate that although the CVLT and RAVLT measure similar cognitive processes in closed-head-injury patients, there are major discrepancies in test interpretation using existing norms. Test and norm set selection significantly influence the likelihood of a patient being classified as memory-impaired.
对中度和重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者进行了加利福尼亚言语学习测试（CVLT）和雷伊听觉言语学习测试（RAVLT）。结果表明，各测试原始分数之间高度相关。各测试平均原始分数之间无显著差异。然而，根据CVLT和RAVLT现有常模计算的标准分数在CVLT上显著低于RAVLT。此外，不同的RAVLT常模组之间也存在差异。结果表明，虽然CVLT和RAVLT在闭合性颅脑损伤患者中测量的是相似的认知过程，但使用现有常模进行测试解释时存在重大差异。测试和常模组的选择显著影响患者被归类为记忆受损的可能性。
