Wells T N, Power C A, Lusti-Narasimhan M, Hoogewerf A J, Cooke R M, Chung C W, Peitsch M C, Proudfoot A E
Glaxo Institute for Molecular Biology, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Leukoc Biol. 1996 Jan;59(1):53-60. doi: 10.1002/jlb.59.1.53.
The chemokine superfamily can be subdivided into two groups based on their amino terminal cysteine spacing. The CXC chemokines are primarily involved in neutrophil-mediated inflammation and, so far, two human receptors have been cloned. The CC chemokines tend to be involved in chronic inflammation, and recently we have cloned a fourth leukocyte receptor for this group of ligands. Understanding what makes one receptor bind its range of agonists is important if we are to develop potent selective antagonist. We have started to investigate the molecular basis of this receptor selectivity by looking at why CC chemokines do not bind to the CXC receptors in several ways. First, we looked at the role of the three-dimensional structure of the ligand, and have solved the three dimensional structure of RANTES using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The structure is similar to that already determined for the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta, and it has a completely different dimer interface to that of the CXC chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8). However, the monomer structures of all the chemokines are very similar, and at physiological concentrations the proteins are likely to be monomeric. Second, by examining all the known CC and CXC chemokines, we have found a region that differs between the two subfamilies. Mutations of one of the residues in this region, Leu-25 in IL-8, to tyrosine (which is conserved at this position in CC chemokines) enables the mutant IL-8 to bind CC chemokine receptor-1 (CC-CKR-1) and introduces monocyte chemoattractant activity. Using other mutations in this region, we can show a direct interaction with the N-terminus of CC-CKR-1. Third, we have found that modification of the amino terminus of RANTES by addition of one amino acid makes it into an antagonist with nanomolar potency. Taken together, this data suggests a two-site model for receptor activation and for selectivity between CC and CXC chemokines, with an initial receptor contact provided by the main body of the chemokine, and activation provided by the amino terminal region.
趋化因子超家族可根据其氨基末端半胱氨酸的间距分为两组。CXC趋化因子主要参与中性粒细胞介导的炎症反应,到目前为止,已克隆出两种人类受体。CC趋化因子往往参与慢性炎症反应,最近我们已克隆出针对这组配体的第四种白细胞受体。如果我们要开发强效的选择性拮抗剂,了解是什么使得一种受体与其一系列激动剂结合很重要。我们已开始通过多种方式研究CC趋化因子为何不与CXC受体结合,以此来探究这种受体选择性的分子基础。首先,我们研究了配体三维结构的作用,并利用核磁共振光谱法解析了RANTES的三维结构。该结构与已确定的CC趋化因子巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1β的结构相似,并且其与CXC趋化因子白细胞介素-8(IL-8)的二聚体界面完全不同。然而,所有趋化因子的单体结构非常相似,在生理浓度下这些蛋白质可能以单体形式存在。其次,通过研究所有已知的CC和CXC趋化因子,我们发现了两个亚家族之间存在差异的一个区域。将IL-8中该区域的一个残基Leu-25突变为酪氨酸(在CC趋化因子中该位置是保守的),可使突变型IL-8结合CC趋化因子受体-1(CC-CKR-1)并引入单核细胞趋化活性。利用该区域的其他突变,我们可以证明其与CC-CKR-1的N末端存在直接相互作用。第三,我们发现通过添加一个氨基酸对RANTES的氨基末端进行修饰,可使其成为具有纳摩尔效力的拮抗剂。综合这些数据表明,对于受体激活以及CC和CXC趋化因子之间的选择性存在一种双位点模型,趋化因子主体提供初始受体接触,而氨基末端区域提供激活作用。