Camfield C, Camfield P, Gordon K, Dooley J
Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Neurology. 1996 Jan;46(1):41-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.1.41.
Using a population-based regional cohort of 479 children with epilepsy, we studied the effect of the number of pretreatment afebrile seizures on seizure control and remission. The number of pretreatment seizures varied from 1 to 20. For the first 10 pretreatment seizures, there was no significant difference or trend in (1) the proportion of children who were seizure free long enough to attempt stopping medication (mean, 70%), (2) the number of breakthrough seizures before control was achieved, or (3) the proportion of children who were seizure free after stopping medication for the first time (mean, 70%). More patients with more than 10 pretreatment seizures had complex partial seizures (59%) than those with 10 or fewer seizures (16%) (p < 0.00001). We conclude that there does not appear to be any penalty for seizure control or early remission of epilepsy if medication is delayed for up to 10 pretreatment seizures.
我们以一个基于人群的包含479例癫痫患儿的区域队列作为研究对象,探讨了发热性惊厥前期发作次数对癫痫控制和缓解的影响。发热性惊厥前期发作次数从1次到20次不等。对于前10次发热性惊厥前期发作,在以下方面不存在显著差异或趋势:(1)无癫痫发作时间足够长以尝试停药的儿童比例(平均为70%);(2)在达到控制之前的突破性癫痫发作次数;(3)首次停药后无癫痫发作的儿童比例(平均为70%)。与发作次数为10次或更少的患儿相比,发热性惊厥前期发作次数超过10次的患儿中有更多比例出现复杂部分性发作(59%对16%)(p < 0.00001)。我们得出结论,如果因多达10次发热性惊厥前期发作而延迟用药,在癫痫控制或早期缓解方面似乎并无不利影响。