French J A, Mosier M, Walker S, Sommerville K, Sussman N
Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
Neurology. 1996 Jan;46(1):54-61. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.1.54.
This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin 3/day as add-on therapy with that of placebo in patients with focal epilepsy whose complex partial seizures were difficult to control with established antiepilepsy drug therapy. We enrolled 203 patients; 182 (90 placebo; 92 vigabatrin) received drug therapy under double-blind conditions. We increased the daily dosage to 2.5 g/day during a 4-week titration segment and maintained it at 3 g/day during the 12-week maintenance segment. By analyses we found a statistically significant lower frequency of seizures (complex seizures plus partial seizures secondarily generalized) at the end of the study for patients receiving vigabatrin than for those receiving placebo. The median monthly frequency was reduced by three seizures per 28 days in the placebo group (baseline, 8.3; end of study, 7.5) (p = 0.0002). Therapeutic success (a 50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly seizure frequency) was attained in 40 of the vigabatrin patients (43%) compared with 17 of those treated with placebo (19%) (p < 0.001). Vigabatrin significantly increased the mean number of seizure-free days per 28 days (2.2 days) compared with placebo (0.5 days) (p = 0.0024). Mean trough serum vigabatrin concentration during therapy was 8.6 +/- 7.7 micrograms/ml. The oral clearance of vigabatrin was determined to be 7.8 L/hr, and the elimination half-life was 8.4 hours. No clinically important changes in MRI, evoked potential, or other laboratory tests were noted during vigabatrin treatment. The results of this study indicate that 3 g/day vigabatrin is more effective than placebo as add-on therapy. Vigabatrin was well tolerated, compliance was high with twice-daily administration, and therapy did not result in clinically relevant drug interactions.
本研究比较了氨己烯酸每日3克作为添加疗法与安慰剂对部分性癫痫患者的疗效和耐受性,这些患者的复杂部分性发作难以用已有的抗癫痫药物治疗来控制。我们招募了203名患者;182名(90名服用安慰剂;92名服用氨己烯酸)在双盲条件下接受药物治疗。在为期4周的滴定阶段,我们将每日剂量增加至2.5克/天,并在为期12周的维持阶段将其维持在3克/天。通过分析我们发现,在研究结束时,接受氨己烯酸治疗的患者癫痫发作(复杂发作加继发全身性发作的部分性发作)频率在统计学上显著低于接受安慰剂治疗的患者。安慰剂组每月发作频率中位数每28天减少3次发作(基线时为8.3次;研究结束时为7.5次)(p = 0.0002)。40名服用氨己烯酸的患者(43%)取得了治疗成功(平均每月发作频率较基线降低50%),而服用安慰剂治疗的患者有17名(19%)取得成功(p < 0.001)。与安慰剂(0.5天)相比,氨己烯酸显著增加了每28天无癫痫发作天数的平均值(2.2天)(p = 0.0024)。治疗期间氨己烯酸的平均谷浓度为8.6±7.7微克/毫升。氨己烯酸的口服清除率确定为7.8升/小时,消除半衰期为8.4小时。在氨己烯酸治疗期间,未观察到MRI、诱发电位或其他实验室检查有临床重要变化。本研究结果表明,每日3克氨己烯酸作为添加疗法比安慰剂更有效。氨己烯酸耐受性良好,每日两次给药的依从性高,且治疗未导致临床相关的药物相互作用。