Mannstadt M, Touam M, Fink E, Ureña P, Hruby M, Zingraff J, Uhlenbusch-Körwer I, Grassmann A, Lemke H D, Drüeke T B
Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10(9):1696-700.
Anaphylactoid reactions occurring in uraemic patients haemodialysed with polyacrylonitrile haemodialysis (HD) membranes and being treated with ACE inhibitors have been attributed to an excessive generation of bradykinin.
Here we tested in a prospective trial a new type of polyacrylonitrile membrane (SPAN) with respect to bradykinin generation in nine HD patients receiving either captopril or enalapril. Each patient had three consecutive HD sessions with each of the three tested membranes, high-flux SPAN, high-flux polysulphone (F60) and low-flux Hemophan (GFS Plus 16).
No clinical signs of anaphylactoid reactions were observed in any of these patients but the number of patients was relatively small and the duration of exposure to different membranes relatively short. At 5 min after the start of HD session, plasma bradykinin levels were significantly higher in the venous than in the arterial line for all three HD membranes: SPAN, 18.5 +/- 11.9 versus 12.4 +/- 5.3 fmol/ml (P < 0.05); F60, 19.0 +/- 13.8 versus 11.5 +/- 6.5 fmol/ml (P < 0.01); and GFS Plus 16, 39.1 +/- 22.9 versus 15.8 +/- 12.4 fmol/ml (P < 0.005), mean +/- SD respectively. Higher venous line levels were still observed at the 15 and 60 min time points for F60 and GFS Plus 16, but not for SPAN. However, these levels were still insignificant compared to levels measured during episodes of anaphylactic shock from the literature. Plasma histamine and C5a anaphylatoxin levels did not show any increase during HD with SPAN.
The SPAN membrane did not induce significant bradykinin release in dialysis patients on ACE-inhibitor therapy. It may therefore be used for high-flux dialysis in such patients.
在接受聚丙烯腈血液透析(HD)膜血液透析且同时接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE抑制剂)治疗的尿毒症患者中发生的类过敏反应,被认为是缓激肽过度生成所致。
在此前瞻性试验中,我们针对9名接受卡托普利或依那普利治疗的HD患者,就新型聚丙烯腈膜(SPAN)的缓激肽生成情况进行了测试。每位患者使用三种测试膜(高通量SPAN、高通量聚砜(F60)和低通量血仿膜(GFS Plus 16))分别进行连续三次HD治疗。
这些患者中均未观察到类过敏反应的临床症状,但患者数量相对较少,且接触不同膜的时间相对较短。HD治疗开始后5分钟时,对于所有三种HD膜,静脉端血浆缓激肽水平均显著高于动脉端:SPAN膜,分别为18.5±11.9与12.4±5.3 fmol/ml(P<0.05);F60膜,19.0±13.8与11.5±6.5 fmol/ml(P<0.01);GFS Plus 16膜,39.1±22.9与15.8±12.4 fmol/ml(P<0.005),均值±标准差。在15分钟和60分钟时间点,F60膜和GFS Plus 16膜的静脉端水平仍较高,但SPAN膜未出现这种情况。然而,与文献中过敏性休克发作期间测得的水平相比,这些水平仍无显著意义。使用SPAN膜进行HD治疗期间,血浆组胺和C5a过敏毒素水平未出现任何升高。
对于接受ACE抑制剂治疗的透析患者,SPAN膜不会诱导显著的缓激肽释放。因此,它可用于此类患者的高通量透析。