• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植的机械桥梁:何时太早?何时太晚?

Mechanical bridge to transplantation: when is too early? When is too late?

作者信息

Loisance D Y, Pouillart F, Benvenuti C, Deleuze P H, Mazzucotelli J P, Le Besnerais P, Mourtada A

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 1431, Hospital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):388-90; discussion 391-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01024-6.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(95)01024-6
PMID:8561611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal timing of implantation of a mechanical circulatory support system in the treatment of acute cardiogenic shock is still unsettled. The issue has been addressed in a retrospective analysis of a group of 98 patients in cardiogenic shock refractory to medical therapy who were candidates for cardiac transplantation, admitted from 1987 to 1994.

METHODS

The treatment included reinforced inotropic support by addition of phosphodiesterase inhibitors to sympathomimetic agents. The patients who did not improve were immediately brought to the operating room for mechanical circulatory support system implantation.

RESULTS

The overall survival in the group of 28 patients selected for mechanical bridge is 50%. No predictive factors of death or multiorgan failure while on the device could be identified, suggesting a lack of contraindications to mechanical circulatory support system implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The high death rate in patients maintained on medical therapy because of initial improvement as they are awaiting transplantation suggests the benefit of a rapid semielective implantation of an intracorporeal device.

摘要

背景

在急性心源性休克治疗中,机械循环支持系统植入的最佳时机仍未确定。1987年至1994年收治的一组98例对药物治疗无效的心源性休克患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者均为心脏移植候选人,探讨了该问题。

方法

治疗包括在拟交感神经药基础上加用磷酸二酯酶抑制剂以增强心肌收缩力支持。病情无改善的患者立即送入手术室植入机械循环支持系统。

结果

入选接受机械桥接治疗的28例患者的总体生存率为50%。未发现使用该装置期间死亡或多器官功能衰竭的预测因素,这表明机械循环支持系统植入没有禁忌证。

结论

因初始病情改善而等待移植期间接受药物治疗的患者死亡率很高,这表明快速半选择性植入体内装置有益。

相似文献

1
Mechanical bridge to transplantation: when is too early? When is too late?移植的机械桥梁:何时太早?何时太晚?
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):388-90; discussion 391-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01024-6.
2
Experience with the Levitronix CentriMag circulatory support system as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure.使用Levitronix CentriMag循环支持系统作为难治性急性心源性休克和多系统器官衰竭患者决策桥梁的经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Aug;134(2):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.085.
3
Emergency ventricular assist device: better survival rates in non-post cardiotomy-related cardiogenic shock.急诊心室辅助装置:在非心脏手术后的心源性休克中生存率更高。
Acta Chir Belg. 2001 Sep-Oct;101(5):226-31.
4
Seven years' experience with the Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist device.使用皮尔斯-多纳希心室辅助装置的七年经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Dec;96(6):901-11.
5
Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age.老年患者的永久性机械循环支持
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):610-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.017.
6
The Papworth experience with the Levitronix CentriMag ventricular assist device.帕普沃思医院使用莱维特尼克斯CentriMag心室辅助装置的经验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.015.
7
Cardiac transplantation after mechanical circulatory support: a Canadian perspective.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jun;61(6):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00138-5.
8
Improved survival after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with circulatory support and transplantation: comparing aggressive intervention with conservative treatment.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克经循环支持和移植后的生存改善:积极干预与保守治疗的比较
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 May;25(5):504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.10.011. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
9
[Mechanical circulatory support: 15 years of experience in the Heart Center North Rhine-Westphalia].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Apr 8;129(15):800-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-822877.
10
Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.经皮左心室辅助装置在严重难治性心源性休克患者中作为长期左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁的应用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan;27(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?经皮心室辅助装置:新的解围之神?
Minim Invasive Surg. 2011;2011:604397. doi: 10.1155/2011/604397. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
2
Integrated management of cardiac failure: the cardiac failure clinic.心力衰竭的综合管理:心力衰竭临床。
Front Med. 2011 Mar;5(1):20-5. doi: 10.1007/s11684-011-0106-1. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
3
Thoratec paracorporeal biventricular assist device therapy: the Freiburg experience.体外双心室辅助装置治疗:弗莱堡经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):207-12; discussion 212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.002.
4
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮左心室辅助装置在心源性休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Sep;11(5):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0051-7.
5
Percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.用于心源性休克的经皮心室辅助装置
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2008 Sep;5(3):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s11897-008-0025-x.