• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症临床试验中的随机同意设计。

Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Altman D G, Whitehead J, Parmar M K, Stenning S P, Fayers P M, Machin D

机构信息

Medical Statistics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, U.K.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1995 Nov;31A(12):1934-44. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00470-x.

DOI:10.1016/0959-8049(95)00470-x
PMID:8562145
Abstract

In 1977, Zelen proposed a new design for clinical trials with the aim of increasing recruitment by avoiding some of the problems associated with obtaining informed consent. These 'randomised consent' designs have proved controversial, and have not often been used. This paper explains the statistical aspects of single and double randomised consent designs and reviews some of the ethical issues. All identified published cancer treatment trials using a randomised consent design are considered in some detail. Reasons for and against the use of these designs are summarised.

摘要

1977年,泽伦提出了一种新的临床试验设计,旨在通过避免一些与获得知情同意相关的问题来增加受试者招募。这些“随机同意”设计已被证明存在争议,且使用并不频繁。本文解释了单随机同意设计和双随机同意设计的统计学方面,并审视了一些伦理问题。对所有已识别出的采用随机同意设计的已发表癌症治疗试验进行了详细考量。总结了支持和反对使用这些设计的理由。

相似文献

1
Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中的随机同意设计。
Eur J Cancer. 1995 Nov;31A(12):1934-44. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00470-x.
2
Adaptive designs, informed consent, and the ethics of research.适应性设计、知情同意与研究伦理
Control Clin Trials. 2001 Jun;22(3):203-10. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00122-2.
3
Should Zelen pre-randomised consent designs be used in some neonatal trials?在某些新生儿试验中是否应采用泽伦预随机同意设计?
J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):325-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.4.325.
4
Using the Zelen design in randomized controlled trials: debates and controversies.在随机对照试验中使用泽伦设计:争论与争议。
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Apr;38(2):200-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02164.x.
5
Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.队列内试验的伦理与实践:一种新兴的实用试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746620. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: new and common ethical challenges.在整群随机临床试验中知情同意:新的和共同的伦理挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Feb;44(2):114-120. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104249. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions.一项定性研究,探讨麦克纳尔蒂 - 泽伦设计在评估教育干预措施的随机对照试验中的可接受性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 17;16:169. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0356-0.
8
['Informed consent' and prerandomization].知情同意与随机分组前
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 1;144(27):1301-3.
9
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec;2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
10
Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"?为新生儿随机对照试验获取知情同意——一种“繁琐的程序”?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F143-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.3.f143.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of telephone-based health coaching on patient-reported outcomes and health behavior change: A randomized controlled trial.基于电话的健康辅导对患者报告结果和健康行为改变的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 22;15(9):e0236861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236861. eCollection 2020.
2
A scoping review of the problems and solutions associated with contamination in trials of complex interventions in mental health.一项关于精神卫生领域复杂干预措施试验中污染相关问题及解决方案的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0646-z.
3
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.
针对有干预措施的研究的知情同意规则的例外情况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 6;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0092-6.
4
Wraparound care for youth injured by violence: study protocol for a pilot randomised control trial.针对受暴力伤害青少年的全方位护理:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 May 19;5(5):e008088. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008088.
5
Can we deliver randomized trials of focal therapy in prostate cancer?我们能否在前列腺癌中开展局部治疗的随机临床试验?
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug;11(8):482-91. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.44. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
6
Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic knee pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial using a Zelen design.针灸治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的疗效:一项采用 Zelen 设计的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Sep 19;12:161. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-161.
7
Dealing with missing outcomes: lessons from a randomized trial of a prenatal intervention to prevent early childhood caries.处理缺失结局:一项预防幼儿龋齿的产前干预随机试验的经验教训。
Open Dent J. 2010 Jul 16;4:55-60. doi: 10.2174/1874210601004020055.
8
Mistletoe Preparation Iscador: Are there Methodological Concerns with Respect to Controlled Clinical Trials?槲寄生制剂 Iscador:关于对照临床试验是否存在方法学问题?
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009 Mar;6(1):19-30. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem121. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
9
Postcards from the EDge project: randomised controlled trial of an intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning.“急诊室边缘明信片”项目:一项使用明信片减少住院治疗的蓄意自我中毒复发情况的干预措施的随机对照试验
BMJ. 2005 Oct 8;331(7520):805. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38579.455266.E0. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
10
Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.整群随机试验的偏倚风险证据:对发表在三本综合医学期刊上的近期试验的综述
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.785.