Porwit-MacDonald A, Janossy G, Ivory K, Swirsky D, Peters R, Wheatley K, Walker H, Turker A, Goldstone A H, Burnett A
Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
Blood. 1996 Feb 1;87(3):1162-9.
During the immunodiagnosis of 517 cases of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) entered into the Medical Research Council (MRC) AML 10 trials, we have observed the CD34 precursor cell antigen more frequently in AML of M2 morphology, especially in the 84% of cases with the t(8;21) chromosomal translocation, than in any other French-American-British classification group. CD34 expression was then quantified (using QIFI and Quantum Simply Cellular beads [Flow Cytometry Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC] and CD34+ standard cells). When CD34 antibody-binding capacity (ABC) of normal bone marrow (BM) precursors and leukemic blasts was compared, it was shown that AML M2 cases with t(8;21) not only had the highest percentages of CD34+ blasts, but in > 80% of CD34+ cases the individual blasts expressed higher than normal levels of CD34 antigen (> 60 x 10(3) ABC per cell). In addition, in 73% of this group CD34 antigen was overexpressed in an asynchronous combination with cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (MPO). Other signs of asynchrony included high CD34 expression with CD15 and/or CD56, as well as aberrant combinations of CD13 with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and CD19. These findings demonstrate that asynchrony is identifiable in virtually every case of AML with t(8;21), although it does not always involve the same antigens. M2 cases with t(8;21), mostly CD34+, had a 100% remission rate and 71% 5-year survival rate; other patients with CD34+ or CD34- AML showed 69% and 84% remission rates and 31% and 36% 5-year survival rates, respectively. Consequently, individual markers such as CD34 should be interpreted in relation to other features such as chromosomal changes. These simple methods, which are well suited to quantify the expression of ligands, are a useful contribution to diagnosis: 60% to 65% of M2 cases with t(8;21) are rapidly identified by CD34 overexpression alone. This aberration, together with the other signs of asynchrony seen at presentation, can be used to search for residual leukemia after therapy.
在对纳入医学研究委员会(MRC)AML 10试验的517例急性髓性白血病(AML)患者进行免疫诊断期间,我们观察到,与其他法美英分类组相比,M2形态的AML中CD34前体细胞抗原出现得更为频繁,尤其是在84%伴有t(8;21)染色体易位的病例中。然后对CD34表达进行了定量分析(使用QIFI和量子简易细胞微球[流式细胞术标准品,北卡罗来纳州三角研究园]以及CD34+标准细胞)。当比较正常骨髓(BM)前体细胞和白血病原始细胞的CD34抗体结合能力(ABC)时,发现伴有t(8;21)的AML M2病例不仅CD34+原始细胞的百分比最高,而且在超过80%的CD34+病例中,单个原始细胞表达的CD34抗原水平高于正常水平(每个细胞>60×10(3) ABC)。此外,在该组73%的病例中,CD34抗原与细胞质髓过氧化物酶(MPO)呈异步组合过表达。其他异步迹象包括CD34与CD15和/或CD56的高表达,以及CD13与末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶(TdT)和CD19的异常组合。这些发现表明,在几乎每例伴有t(8;21)的AML病例中都可识别出异步现象,尽管并不总是涉及相同的抗原。伴有t(8;21)的M2病例大多为CD34+,缓解率为100%,5年生存率为71%;其他CD34+或CD34- AML患者的缓解率分别为69%和84%,5年生存率分别为31%和36%。因此,诸如CD34等个体标志物应结合其他特征(如染色体变化)进行解读。这些非常适合定量配体表达的简单方法对诊断很有帮助:仅通过CD34过表达就能快速识别60%至65%伴有t(8;21)的M2病例。这种异常,连同初诊时出现得其他异步迹象,可用于治疗后寻找残留白血病。