Aviña-Zubieta J A, Galindo-Rodriguez G, Kwan-Yeung L, Davis P, Russell A S
Rheumatic Disease Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Lupus. 1995 Oct;4(5):370-4. doi: 10.1177/096120339500400507.
Fifty four coded sera, 38 from eight patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), four from one patient with systemic vasculitis, one from one patient with polyarthritis and 11 normal controls were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies using seven commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and the radioimmunoassay method (RIA) routinely used in our unit. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were tested for both SLE diagnosis and disease activity. Using anti-dsDNA antibodies as a diagnostic test for SLE there were differences in sensitivity (from 66% to 95%), specificity (from 75% to 100%), predictive positive values (from 89% to 100%) and predictive negative values (from 50% to 87%) among ELISA kits. The RIA method was either more specific or equal to ELISA kits. Using 'equivocal' values as positive values an increase in sensitivity was observed but at the expense of specificity. Similar differences and trends were observed when the results were used as a measure for disease activity. This suggests that there are differences in sensitivity, specificity and predictive values among ELISA kits both in the diagnosis of SLE as well as in the determination of disease activity.
使用七种商用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和我们单位常规使用的放射免疫测定法(RIA),对54份编码血清进行了抗双链DNA抗体检测,其中38份来自8例系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者,4份来自1例系统性血管炎患者,1份来自1例多关节炎患者,11份为正常对照。对SLE诊断和疾病活动的敏感性、特异性和预测值进行了检测。将抗双链DNA抗体用作SLE的诊断试验时,各ELISA试剂盒在敏感性(从66%至95%)、特异性(从75%至100%)、预测阳性值(从89%至100%)和预测阴性值(从50%至87%)方面存在差异。RIA法要么特异性更高,要么与ELISA试剂盒相当。将“可疑”值用作阳性值时,敏感性有所提高,但特异性降低。当将结果用作疾病活动的衡量指标时,也观察到了类似的差异和趋势。这表明,ELISA试剂盒在SLE诊断以及疾病活动度测定方面,其敏感性、特异性和预测值存在差异。