McHugh S M, Deighton J, Stewart A G, Lachmann P J, Ewan P W
Molecular Immunopathology Unit, Medical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1995 Sep;25(9):828-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1995.tb00025.x.
The mechanism of immunotherapy is unclear. Allergic disease is known to involve enhanced TH-2 cytokine responses to allergen.
In order to investigate the mechanisms of immunotherapy, we have examined changes in cytokine secretion before (13 patients) and during (nine patients) both rush and conventional venom immunotherapy (VIT) in bee venom allergic patients.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated in vitro with bee venom, non-specific antigen or mitogen and secretion of IL-4 (TH-2) and IFN gamma (TH-1) over the culture period measured.
Untreated patients had TH-2 responses to venom and TH-1 responses to antigen and strong proliferative responses to venom. Controls showed no response (proliferation or cytokines) to venom and the normal TH-1 response to antigen. VIT resulted in marked changes in cytokine secretion to venom, with reduction of the abnormal TH-2 response and induction of a TH-1 response. The pattern differed in rush and conventional VIT. One day after rush VIT there was a significant fall in IL-4 secretion (P < 0.01), which rose by 3 weeks then declined. In conventional VIT there was a gradual reduction of IL-4 production significant after 2 months and undetectable by 6 months. IFN gamma secretion was induced by VIT. Proliferative responses mirrored the IL-4 changes. One day after rush VIT there was a loss of T cells, monocytes and NK cells from peripheral blood.
This study shows that immunotherapy shifted cytokine responses to allergen from a TH-2 to a TH-1 dominant pattern, suggesting direct effects on T cells. How these cytokine changes relate to clinical desensitization is not clear. In the longer term they would result in an isotype switch from IgE to IgG. Early changes in cytokine or chemokine production might downregulate mast cell or basophil reactivity and explain the rapid desensitization in rush VIT.
免疫疗法的机制尚不清楚。已知变应性疾病涉及对变应原增强的TH-2细胞因子反应。
为了研究免疫疗法的机制,我们检测了蜂毒变应性患者在快速和常规蜂毒免疫疗法(VIT)之前(13例患者)和期间(9例患者)细胞因子分泌的变化。
用蜂毒、非特异性抗原或丝裂原体外刺激外周血单个核细胞,并测定培养期间IL-4(TH-2)和IFNγ(TH-1)的分泌。
未经治疗的患者对蜂毒有TH-2反应,对抗原有TH-1反应,对蜂毒有强烈的增殖反应。对照组对蜂毒无反应(增殖或细胞因子),对抗原有正常的TH-1反应。VIT导致对蜂毒的细胞因子分泌发生显著变化,异常的TH-2反应降低,TH-1反应诱导。快速和常规VIT的模式不同。快速VIT后1天,IL-4分泌显著下降(P<0.01),3周时上升,然后下降。在常规VIT中,IL-4产生逐渐减少,2个月后显著,6个月时无法检测到。VIT诱导IFNγ分泌。增殖反应反映了IL-4的变化。快速VIT后1天,外周血中T细胞、单核细胞和NK细胞减少。
本研究表明,免疫疗法将对变应原的细胞因子反应从TH-2主导模式转变为TH-1主导模式,提示对T细胞有直接作用。这些细胞因子变化与临床脱敏的关系尚不清楚。从长远来看,它们将导致从IgE到IgG的同种型转换。细胞因子或趋化因子产生的早期变化可能下调肥大细胞或嗜碱性粒细胞的反应性,并解释快速VIT中的快速脱敏。