Resistance of the failing dystrophic hamster heart to the cardioprotective effects of diltiazem and clentiazem: evidence of coronary vascular dysfunctions.

Although hypothermia and cardioplegic cardiac arrest provide effective protection during cardiac surgery, ischemia of long duration, poor preoperative myocardial function, and ventricular hypertrophy may lead to heterogeneous delivery of cardioplegic solutions, incomplete protection, and impaired postischemic recovery. Calcium antagonists are potent cardioprotective agents, but their efficacy in the presence of cold cardioplegia is still controversial, especially in heart failure, since it is often believed that failing hearts are more sensitive to their negative inotropic and chronotropic actions. However, recent data have demonstrated that the benzothiazepine-like calcium antagonists diltiazem and clentiazem, in selected dose ranges, elicit significant cardioprotection independently of intrinsic cardiodepression, thus lending support to their use in cardioprotective maneuvers involving the failing heart. We therefore evaluated the cardioprotective interaction of diltiazem, clentiazem, and cold cardioplegia in both normal and failing ischemic hearts. Hearts were excised from 200- to 225-day-old cardiomyopathic hamsters (CMHs) of the UM-X7.1 line and age-matched normal healthy controls. Ex vivo perfusion was performed at a constant pressure (140 cmH2O; 1 cmH2O = 98.1 Pa) according to the method of Langendorff. Heart rate, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), and coronary flow were monitored throughout the study. Global ischemia was produced for 90 min by shutting down the perfusate flow, followed by reperfusion for 30 min. Normal and failing CMH hearts were either untreated (control) or perfused at the onset of global ischemia with one of the following combinations: cold cardioplegia alone (St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution, 4 degrees C, infused for 2 min), cold cardioplegia + 10 nM diltiazem, or cold cardioplegia + 10 nM clentiazem. The cardiac and coronary dilator properties of 10 nM diltiazem and 10 nM clentiazem alone were investigated in separate groups of isolated preparations. Failing CMH hearts had lower basal LVDP (42 +/- 2 vs. 77 +/- 2 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.3 Pa) for normal hearts, p < 0.05), while coronary flow was only slightly reduced (5.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.2 mL/min for normal hearts). Following 90 min global ischemia, coronary flow was increased in both groups, but the peak hyperemic response declined only in failing CMH hearts (+50 +/- 17 vs. +82 +/- 17% in normal hearts). In normal hearts, LVDP virtually recovered within 5 min of reperfusion but steadily decreased thereafter (-37 +/- 4% at 30 min). In contrast, in failing CMH hearts, LVDP significantly decreased early during reperfusion but improved over time (-19 +/- 7% at 30 min). In normal hearts, the addition of diltiazem or clentiazem to cold cardioplegic solutions resulted in improved postischemic contractile function for the duration of reperfusion (85 +/- 4% vs. only 71 +/- 6% for cardioplegia, p < 0.05). The post-ischemic increase in coronary flow was similar in all groups. In failing CMH hearts, the addition of diltiazem or clentiazem afforded no significant contractile benefit at reperfusion. In nonischemic normal hearts, infusion of diltiazem or clentiazem (10 nM) alone increased coronary flow (+6 +/- 1% for diltiazem and +24 +/- 3% for clentiazem) without significant negative inotropic or chronotropic effects. In nonischemic failing CMH hearts, infusion of diltiazem or clentiazem did not elicit cardiodepression. In contrast their coronary dilator actions reverted to vasoconstriction (diltiazem) or were significantly attenuated (clentiazem). From these experiments we can conclude that, compared with the normal heart, the failing CMH heart adapted differently to global ischemia.