• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

启动抗高血压治疗的现代方法。

Modern approaches to initiating antihypertensive therapy.

作者信息

Gavras H, Gavras I

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Clin. 1995 Nov;13(4):593-8.

PMID:8565022
Abstract

From the five broad classes of antihypertensive drugs that have been in use long enough for adequate clinical experience to be obtained, the most recent report of the Joint National Committee on Hypertension recommends drugs from two older classes--the diuretics and the beta-adrenergic blockers--as first-line treatment. This article argues that newer drugs and in particular the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may be equally or more appropriate as first choice. Physicians should choose on the basis of a drug's pharmacologic properties and the patient's clinical profile, rather than according to a generic set of rules. Considering that the goals of modern antihypertensive therapy are not only lowering of blood pressure to prevent complications, but also long-term cardioprotection without adverse effects on the quality of life, some newer drugs might even prove more cost-effective in the long run.

摘要

在已使用足够长时间以积累充分临床经验的五大类抗高血压药物中,美国国家高血压联合委员会的最新报告推荐两类较老的药物——利尿剂和β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂——作为一线治疗药物。本文认为,更新的药物,尤其是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,可能同样适合或更适合作为首选。医生应根据药物的药理特性和患者的临床情况进行选择,而不是按照一套通用规则。鉴于现代抗高血压治疗的目标不仅是降低血压以预防并发症,还包括长期心脏保护且不对生活质量产生不良影响,从长远来看,一些更新的药物甚至可能被证明更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Modern approaches to initiating antihypertensive therapy.启动抗高血压治疗的现代方法。
Cardiol Clin. 1995 Nov;13(4):593-8.
2
Clinical overview of antihypertensive classes--clinically relevant differences: myths or facts? Based on a presentation by Alan H. Gradman, MD.抗高血压药物类别临床概述——临床相关差异:误解还是事实?基于医学博士艾伦·H·格拉德曼的一次演讲。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Mar;6(4 Suppl):S197-210.
3
[Recent intervention studies with antihypertensive drugs and their influence on guidelines].[近期抗高血压药物干预研究及其对指南的影响]
Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Dec 15;98(12):771-5. doi: 10.1007/s00063-003-1323-4.
4
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
5
Treatment of hypertension from volume to vasoconstriction: The ACE up your sleeve.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;15(4):225-36. doi: 10.1053/svas.2002.36258.
6
The need for evidence in hypertension management: historical perspective.高血压管理中对证据的需求:历史视角
Ann Saudi Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):367-74.
7
[Are the newer antihypertensive agents better and more effective than diuretics?].[新型抗高血压药物比利尿剂更好、更有效吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Feb 28;121(6):701-5.
8
Combination antihypertensive drugs: recommendations for use.联合降压药物:使用建议
Am Fam Physician. 2000 May 15;61(10):3049-56.
9
Long-term safety of antihypertensive therapy.抗高血压治疗的长期安全性。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2006 Jul-Aug;49(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2006.06.002.
10
The choice of an initial antihypertensive agent.
J Clin Hypertens. 1986 Sep;2(3):219-29.

引用本文的文献

1
Should we spend less or control a greater percentage of hypertensive patients?我们应该减少高血压患者数量还是控制更大比例的高血压患者?
Sao Paulo Med J. 2002 Jul 4;120(4):99. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802002000400001.