Suppr超能文献

奥沙普秦与萘丁美酮治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效及安全性比较。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

作者信息

Weaver A, Rubin B, Caldwell J, McMahon F G, Lee D, Makarowski W, Offenberg H, Sack M, Sikes D, Trapp R

机构信息

Arthritis Center of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;17(4):735-45. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80050-6.

Abstract

This multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily with that of nabumetone 1000 mg once daily in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. To be eligible, patients had to experience a flare of OA within 2 weeks of discontinuing their usual OA medication (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or analgesic). Eligible patients were assessed at baseline and then randomized to receive oxaprozin (n = 109), nabumetone (n = 110), or placebo (n = 109). Efficacy assessments were performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Primary efficacy variables included knee pain on weight bearing, knee pain on motion, and patient's and physician's global assessments of OA. Secondary efficacy variables included pain intensity, time to walk 50 feet, and duration of morning stiffness. Safety was evaluated by use of routine laboratory analyses; physical examination at screening, baseline, and week 6 (or study termination); assessment of symptoms at baseline and at each visit; and testing stools for occult blood at screening and between week 4 and the final visit. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Between-group differences in efficacy variables were evident by week 1. The mean change in improvement from baseline with oxaprozin compared with placebo was statistically significant in favor of oxaprozin at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 for all primary efficacy variables. The mean change in improvement from baseline with nabumetone compared with placebo, however, was statistically significant only at week 1 for knee pain on motion, patient's global assessment, and physician's global assessment. The mean change in improvement from baseline was statistically significant (P < or = 0.035) in favor of oxaprozin versus nabumetone at weeks 2 and 6 for all four primary efficacy variables and also at week 4 for knee pain on motion. The incidence of adverse clinical events between treatment groups was not statistically significant. However, nine oxaprozin-treated patients had asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations reported as adverse events. Four of these patients had reversible elevations of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase greater than three times the upper limit of normal range (P < 0.05); two of these patients were taking other medications known to induce liver enzyme abnormalities. The study showed that oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily was statistically significantly more efficacious than nabumetone 1000 mg once daily for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee. Both drugs were clinically well tolerated.

摘要

这项多中心、为期6周的双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,比较了每日一次服用1200毫克奥沙普秦与每日一次服用1000毫克萘丁美酮对中重度膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的疗效和安全性。符合条件的患者在停用其常用的OA药物(非甾体抗炎药或镇痛药)后2周内必须经历OA病情发作。符合条件的患者在基线时进行评估,然后随机分组接受奥沙普秦(n = 109)、萘丁美酮(n = 110)或安慰剂(n = 109)。在第1、2、4和6周进行疗效评估。主要疗效变量包括负重时的膝关节疼痛、活动时的膝关节疼痛以及患者和医生对OA的整体评估。次要疗效变量包括疼痛强度、步行50英尺的时间以及晨僵持续时间。通过常规实验室分析评估安全性;在筛查、基线和第6周(或研究终止时)进行体格检查;在基线和每次就诊时评估症状;在筛查时以及第4周和最后一次就诊之间检测粪便潜血。在整个研究过程中监测不良事件。到第1周时,疗效变量的组间差异明显。与安慰剂相比,奥沙普秦组从基线开始的平均改善变化在第1、2、4和6周时对于所有主要疗效变量均具有统计学意义,有利于奥沙普秦。然而,与安慰剂相比,萘丁美酮组从基线开始的平均改善变化仅在第1周时对于活动时的膝关节疼痛、患者的整体评估和医生的整体评估具有统计学意义。在第2周和第6周时,对于所有四个主要疗效变量,以及在第4周时对于活动时的膝关节疼痛,与萘丁美酮相比,奥沙普秦组从基线开始的平均改善变化具有统计学意义(P≤0.035)。各治疗组之间不良临床事件的发生率无统计学意义。然而,有9名接受奥沙普秦治疗的患者报告无症状肝酶升高为不良事件。其中4名患者的天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶可逆性升高超过正常范围上限的三倍(P < 0.05);其中2名患者正在服用其他已知可诱导肝酶异常的药物。该研究表明,对于治疗中重度膝OA患者,每日一次服用1200毫克奥沙普秦在统计学上比每日一次服用1000毫克萘丁美酮更有效。两种药物在临床上耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验