• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用预测的死亡风险评估抗细胞因子疗法在脓毒症中的疗效。重组人白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(rhIL-1ra)III期脓毒症综合征研究组。

Use of predicted risk of mortality to evaluate the efficacy of anticytokine therapy in sepsis. The rhIL-1ra Phase III Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.

作者信息

Knaus W A, Harrell F E, LaBrecque J F, Wagner D P, Pribble J P, Draper E A, Fisher C J, Soll L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199601000-00010
PMID:8565538
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a novel anticytokine therapy in patients with sepsis syndrome, and the relationship between a patient's baseline mortality risk and survival benefit.

DESIGN

Data from a recent phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial with patients randomized to three treatment arms: an intravenous loading dose of recombinant human interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) or placebo, followed by a continuous infusion of rhIL-1ra (1.0 mg/kg/hr, or 2.0 mg/kg/hr), or placebo for 72 hrs.

SETTING

Sixty-three investigative centers in eight countries.

PATIENTS

The study population consisted of 893 patients: 302 placebo patients; 298 patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg/hr of rhIL-1ra; and 293 patients treated with 2.0 mg/kg/hr of rhIL-1ra.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

An independent, sepsis-specific, log-normal regression model that predicts the risk of mortality over 28 days was applied to all patients enrolled into the rhIL-1ra sepsis study. The ability of the Predicted Risk of Mortality model to predict 28-day mortality in the placebo patients was determined and the relationship between mortality risk and efficacy of rhIL-1ra was investigated. The trial data were also analyzed using two other risk-assessment models for comparison with Predicted Risk of Mortality. A significant increase in survival time was demonstrated for all patients treated with rhIL-1ra (n = 893, p < .02 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal), but patients with a Predicted Risk of Mortality of < 24% derived little benefit. Retrospective examination of time-to-death data demonstrated that rhIL-1ra reduced risk of death in the first 2 days for patients with > or = 24% Predicted Risk of Mortality (n = 580, p < .005 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal). This same effect was not present in patients with a Predicted Risk of Mortality of < 24% on entry into the study. The Predicted Risk of Mortality model predicted a 28-day mortality rate of 35% for placebo patients compared with 34% observed and accurately stratified patients along the full range of risks. There was a wide distribution of individual patient risks for 28-day mortality for all patients, as well as within categorical subgroups, such as shock and organ system dysfunction. Two alternate risk models were assessed and the Acute Physiology Score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III also demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit for rhIL-1ra (p = .04 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal) for all patients treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an appropriate analytic model, a statistically significant increase in survival time from rhIL-1ra was measured. A direct relationship was found between a patient's Predicted Risk of Mortality at study entry to efficacy of rhIL-1ra. Individual risk or severity assessment may be a useful tool for evaluating the clinical benefit of new therapeutic approaches to sepsis and for monitoring outcomes at the bedside.

摘要

目的

研究一种针对脓毒症综合征患者的新型抗细胞因子疗法,以及患者基线死亡风险与生存获益之间的关系。

设计

来自近期一项III期、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验的数据,患者被随机分为三个治疗组:静脉注射负荷剂量的重组人白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(rhIL-1ra)或安慰剂,随后持续输注rhIL-1ra(1.0毫克/千克/小时,或2.0毫克/千克/小时),或安慰剂,持续72小时。

地点

八个国家的63个研究中心。

患者

研究人群包括893名患者:302名接受安慰剂治疗的患者;298名接受1.0毫克/千克/小时rhIL-1ra治疗的患者;以及293名接受2.0毫克/千克/小时rhIL-1ra治疗的患者。

测量指标及主要结果

将一个独立的、针对脓毒症的对数正态回归模型应用于所有纳入rhIL-1ra脓毒症研究的患者,该模型可预测28天内的死亡风险。确定了死亡率预测模型预测安慰剂组患者28天死亡率的能力,并研究了死亡风险与rhIL-1ra疗效之间的关系。还使用另外两种风险评估模型对试验数据进行分析,以便与死亡率预测模型进行比较。接受rhIL-1ra治疗的所有患者(n = 893,死亡率预测对数正态模型p <.02)的生存时间均有显著延长,但死亡风险预测值<24%的患者获益甚微。对死亡时间数据的回顾性分析表明,对于死亡风险预测值≥24%的患者(n = 580,死亡率预测对数正态模型p <.005),rhIL-1ra在最初2天降低了死亡风险。在研究开始时死亡风险预测值<24%的患者中未观察到同样的效果。死亡率预测模型预测安慰剂组患者28天死亡率为35%,而观察到的死亡率为34%,并且该模型能够在整个风险范围内准确地对患者进行分层。所有患者以及休克和器官系统功能障碍等分类亚组内,个体患者28天死亡风险分布广泛。评估了另外两种风险模型,急性生理学与慢性健康状况评价III的急性生理学评分也显示,接受治疗的所有患者使用rhIL-1ra后生存获益具有统计学意义(死亡率预测对数正态模型p =.04)。

结论

使用适当的分析模型,测量到rhIL-1ra使生存时间有统计学意义的显著延长。发现患者研究入组时的死亡风险预测值与rhIL-1ra疗效之间存在直接关系。个体风险或严重程度评估可能是评估脓毒症新治疗方法临床获益以及在床边监测结果的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Use of predicted risk of mortality to evaluate the efficacy of anticytokine therapy in sepsis. The rhIL-1ra Phase III Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.利用预测的死亡风险评估抗细胞因子疗法在脓毒症中的疗效。重组人白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(rhIL-1ra)III期脓毒症综合征研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00010.
2
Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.重组人白细胞介素1受体拮抗剂治疗脓毒症综合征患者。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。III期重组人白细胞介素1受体拮抗剂脓毒症综合征研究组
JAMA. 1994 Jun 15;271(23):1836-43.
3
Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Sepsis Investigator Group.严重脓毒症中白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂的验证性试验:一项III期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验。白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂脓毒症研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;25(7):1115-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199707000-00010.
4
Initial evaluation of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of sepsis syndrome: a randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.人重组白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂治疗脓毒症综合征的初步评估:一项随机、开放标签、安慰剂对照的多中心试验。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00008.
5
Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody to human tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with sepsis syndrome. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. TNF-alpha MAb Sepsis Study Group.抗人肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体治疗脓毒症综合征患者的疗效与安全性。一项随机、对照、双盲、多中心临床试验。肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体脓毒症研究组
JAMA. 1995;273(12):934-41.
6
Platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist BN 52021 in the treatment of severe sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. BN 52021 Sepsis Study Group.血小板活化因子受体拮抗剂BN 52021治疗严重脓毒症:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。BN 52021脓毒症研究组
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1720-8.
7
p55 Tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Ro 45-2081 Study Group.p55肿瘤坏死因子受体融合蛋白治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者:一项随机对照多中心试验。Ro 45 - 2081研究组
JAMA. 1997 May 21;277(19):1531-8.
8
Selenium in Intensive Care (SIC): results of a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-center study in patients with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock.重症监护中的硒(SIC):一项针对严重全身炎症反应综合征、脓毒症和感染性休克患者的前瞻性随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究结果
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):118-26. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251124.83436.0E.
9
Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study.重组组织因子途径抑制剂在严重脓毒症患者中的安全性评估:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、单盲、剂量递增研究。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov;29(11):2081-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200111000-00007.
10
Lenercept (p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein) in severe sepsis and early septic shock: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial with 1,342 patients.来那西普(p55肿瘤坏死因子受体融合蛋白)用于严重脓毒症和早期感染性休克:一项纳入1342例患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心III期试验。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):503-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune dysregulation in sepsis: experiences, lessons and perspectives.脓毒症中的免疫失调:经验、教训与展望。
Cell Death Discov. 2023 Dec 19;9(1):465. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01766-7.
2
Emerging pharmacological therapies for ARDS: COVID-19 and beyond.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的新兴药理学治疗方法:COVID-19 及其他。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2265-2283. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06141-z. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
3
Heterogeneity of treatment effect by baseline risk of mortality in critically ill patients: re-analysis of three recent sepsis and ARDS randomised controlled trials.
危重症患者基线死亡率风险对治疗效果的异质性:三项最近的脓毒症和 ARDS 随机对照试验的再分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 3;23(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2446-1.
4
Why a second look might be worth it: immuno-modulatory therapies in the critically ill patient.二次评估为何值得一试:危重症患者的免疫调节治疗
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):E424-30. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.37.
5
Removal of regulatory T cells prevents secondary chronic infection but increases the mortality of subsequent sub-acute infection in sepsis mice.清除调节性T细胞可预防继发性慢性感染,但会增加脓毒症小鼠随后亚急性感染的死亡率。
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 8;7(10):10962-75. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7682.
6
Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolving understanding.败血症:多种异常、异质性反应和不断发展的认识。
Physiol Rev. 2013 Jul;93(3):1247-88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2012.
7
Antitumor necrosis factor therapy is associated with improved survival in clinical sepsis trials: a meta-analysis.抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗与临床脓毒症试验中的生存率提高相关:一项荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2419-29. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182982add.
8
Positive effect of septimeb™ on mortality rate in severe sepsis: a novel non antibiotic strategy.塞替比星对严重脓毒症死亡率的积极影响:一种新型非抗生素策略。
Daru. 2012 Sep 25;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-20-40.
9
Beneficial effects of stress-dose corticosteroid therapy in canines depend on the severity of staphylococcal pneumonia.应激剂量皮质类固醇治疗犬只的有益效果取决于葡萄球菌性肺炎的严重程度。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Dec;38(12):2063-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2735-5. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
Critical care trial design and interpretation: a primer.危重病治疗试验设计与解读:入门指南。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1882-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eae226.