• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗小儿中耳炎疗效和安全性的多中心比较研究

Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis media.

作者信息

Principi N

机构信息

IV Clinica Pediatrica, Ospedale L. Sacco, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Aug;14(8):669-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01690872.

DOI:10.1007/BF01690872
PMID:8565983
Abstract

An open multicentre study was conducted in 484 children between the ages of 6 months and 12 years with otitis media to compare the efficacy, the safety and the tolerance of once-daily azithromycin given for three days versus thrice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (CA) given for ten days. A satisfactory response (cure plus improvement) was noted 10 to 14 days after the start of treatment in 199 of 215 (92.6%) azithromycin-treated children and in 186 of 198 (93.9%) amoxicillin/CA-treated children. The relationship between treatment and clinical response was independent of chronicity of infection and the presence or absence of a perforated eardrum. Improvement in signs and symptoms of otitis media occurred significantly more rapidly in the children treated with azithromycin. Treatment-related or possibly treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 11 of 243 (4.5%) azithromycin-treated patients and in 20 of 240 (8.3%) treated with amoxicillin/CA. No patients in the azithromycin treatment group were withdrawn from treatment, but six amoxicillin/CA patients, including two < 2 years of age, discontinued treatment prematurely because of adverse events; the difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0146). It is concluded that azithromycin given as an oral suspension once daily for three days is as safe and effective as amoxicillin/CA given thrice daily for ten days in the treatment of children with otitis media.

摘要

一项开放性多中心研究在484名6个月至12岁的中耳炎患儿中进行,以比较连续三天每日一次服用阿奇霉素与连续十天每日三次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸(CA)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。在开始治疗10至14天后,215名接受阿奇霉素治疗的患儿中有199名(92.6%)、198名接受阿莫西林/CA治疗的患儿中有186名(93.9%)获得了满意的反应(治愈加病情改善)。治疗与临床反应之间的关系不受感染慢性程度以及鼓膜穿孔与否的影响。接受阿奇霉素治疗的患儿中耳炎体征和症状的改善明显更快。243名接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者中有11名(4.5%)、240名接受阿莫西林/CA治疗的患者中有20名(8.3%)记录了与治疗相关或可能与治疗相关的不良事件。阿奇霉素治疗组中没有患者退出治疗,但阿莫西林/CA组有6名患者,包括2名2岁以下的患儿,因不良事件提前停药;治疗组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.0146)。得出的结论是,对于中耳炎患儿,连续三天每日一次口服阿奇霉素混悬液与连续十天每日三次服用阿莫西林/CA一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis media.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗小儿中耳炎疗效和安全性的多中心比较研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Aug;14(8):669-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01690872.
2
A multicenter, randomized, open label comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media among children attending day care or school.一项针对日托或学校儿童急性中耳炎的阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐的多中心、随机、开放标签比较研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S24-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00005.
3
A multicenter, open label trial of azithromycin vs. amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the management of acute otitis media in children.一项比较阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心开放标签试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S15-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00003.
4
A multicenter, double blind comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media in children.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心、双盲比较
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S20-3. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00004.
5
Multicentre evaluation of azithromycin in comparison with co-amoxiclav for the treatment of acute otitis media in children.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心评估
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:81-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.81.
6
Twice-daily antibiotics in the treatment of acute otitis media: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus amoxicillin-clavulanate.每日两次使用抗生素治疗急性中耳炎:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与阿莫西林-克拉维酸的对比
CMAJ. 1990 Jan 15;142(2):115-8.
7
Evaluation of amoxicillin clavulanate twice daily versus thrice daily in the treatment of otitis media in children. Danish-Swedish Study Group.儿童中耳炎治疗中阿莫西林克拉维酸盐每日两次与每日三次的疗效评估。丹麦-瑞典研究小组。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 May;12(5):319-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01964426.
8
High-dose azithromycin versus high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.大剂量阿奇霉素与大剂量阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗复发性或持续性急性中耳炎患儿的疗效比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3179-86. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3179-3186.2003.
9
Effectiveness of five days of therapy with cefuroxime axetil suspension for treatment of acute otitis media.头孢呋辛酯干混悬剂五日疗法治疗急性中耳炎的疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Feb;15(2):157-64. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199602000-00013.
10
Twice daily cefpodoxime proxetil compared with thrice daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for treatment of acute otitis media in children.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(5):577-84. doi: 10.3109/00365549409011816.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6:CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub3.
2
Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的含类固醇局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013054.pub3.
3
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的全身性抗生素

本文引用的文献

1
Failure of children to receive penicillin by mouth.儿童未能口服青霉素。
N Engl J Med. 1963 Jun 13;268:1334-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196306132682404.
2
Multicentre evaluation of azithromycin in comparison with co-amoxiclav for the treatment of acute otitis media in children.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心评估
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:81-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.81.
3
A comparative study of azithromycin and amoxycillin in paediatric patients with acute otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub3.
4
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub3.
5
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的全身抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub2.
6
Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的含类固醇局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD013054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013054.pub2.
7
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for otitis media in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿奇霉素和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童中耳炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00434-x.
8
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的疗效比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;2(2):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub2.
9
Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 2;1(1):CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2.
10
A pilot study of single-dose azithromycin versus three-day azithromycin or single-dose ceftriaxone for uncomplicated acute otitis media in children.单剂量阿奇霉素与三日剂量阿奇霉素或单剂量头孢曲松治疗儿童非复杂性急性中耳炎的一项试点研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003;64:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.09.005.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:73-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.73.
4
Comparison of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of otitis media in children.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗儿童中耳炎的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:65-71. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.65.
5
The comparative activity of azithromycin, macrolides and amoxycillin against streptococci in experimental infections.阿奇霉素、大环内酯类药物和阿莫西林在实验性感染中对链球菌的比较活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:29-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.29.
6
Comparison of azithromycin, roxithromycin, and cephalexin penetration kinetics in early and mature abscesses.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:17-28. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.17.
7
Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗上呼吸道感染患者的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:137-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.137.
8
Clinical safety and tolerance of azithromycin in children.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:111-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.111.
9
In-vitro concentration of azithromycin in human phagocytic cells.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:1-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.1.
10
Overview of patient compliance with medication dosing: a literature review.患者药物剂量依从性概述:文献综述
Clin Ther. 1984;6(5):592-9.