• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

志愿者在检索已发表的随机对照试验方面表现如何?渥太华卒中试验注册库OSTR协作组。

How good are volunteers at searching for published randomized controlled trials? The OSTR Collaborative Group. Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry.

出版信息

Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1995;9(4):384-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00514.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00514.x
PMID:8566939
Abstract

The Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry (OSTR) collects information on all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in all languages, in which the primary focus is stroke. Published trials are added to the registry database once they have been identified by volunteers hand searching journals. We undertook this study to assess volunteer sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and reliability in identifying RCTs. Three volunteers participated in this study. The complete contents of five years of one journal were searched (n = 240) as were ten research reports from five journals. Volunteer sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy was 89.5%, 100%, 100%, 99.1%, and 99% respectively. Inter volunteer reliability was 0.87. Searching the published literature to identify RCTs is an enormous task. These results indicate that volunteers, with minimal training, can effectively contribute to this endeavour.

摘要

渥太华中风试验注册库(OSTR)收集所有主要关注中风的随机对照试验(RCT)的信息,无论语言。一旦志愿者通过手工检索期刊识别出已发表的试验,就会将其添加到注册库数据库中。我们开展这项研究以评估志愿者在识别随机对照试验时的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、准确性和可靠性。三名志愿者参与了这项研究。对一份期刊五年的全部内容(n = 240)以及来自五份期刊的十份研究报告进行了检索。志愿者的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性分别为89.5%、100%、100%、99.1%和99%。志愿者之间的可靠性为0.87。通过检索已发表文献来识别随机对照试验是一项艰巨的任务。这些结果表明,经过最少培训的志愿者能够有效地为这项工作做出贡献。

相似文献

1
How good are volunteers at searching for published randomized controlled trials? The OSTR Collaborative Group. Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry.志愿者在检索已发表的随机对照试验方面表现如何?渥太华卒中试验注册库OSTR协作组。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1995;9(4):384-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00514.x.
2
Identification of randomized controlled trials from the emergency medicine literature: comparison of hand searching versus MEDLINE searching.从急诊医学文献中识别随机对照试验:手工检索与MEDLINE检索的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;34(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70268-4.
3
The Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry Collaborative Group and the development of the Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry (OSTR).渥太华卒中试验注册协作组与渥太华卒中试验注册库(OSTR)的建立。
Control Clin Trials. 1994 Dec;15(6):503-11. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90007-8.
4
[Handsearching for randomized controlled clinical trials in German medical journals].[在德国医学期刊中手工检索随机对照临床试验]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Feb;133(6):230-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1017501.
5
The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials.对巴林的两份医学期刊进行手工检索,以查找随机对照试验报告。
Saudi Med J. 2006 Apr;27(4):526-30.
6
[Hand searching for controlled clinical trials in German surgical journals. A contribution to evidence-based surgery].[在德国外科期刊中手动检索对照临床试验。对循证外科的一项贡献]
Chirurg. 2007 Nov;78(11):1052-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1372-y.
7
Hand searching the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health as part of th Cochrane Collaboration.作为Cochrane协作网的一部分,人工检索《流行病学与社区卫生杂志》。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50(2):178-81. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.2.178.
8
A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials.手工检索与MEDLINE检索用于识别随机对照试验报告的比较。
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1625-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.1191.
9
Handsearching the Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps for trials.在《皇家陆军军医军团杂志》上手工检索试验相关内容。
J R Army Med Corps. 1999 Jun;145(2):86-8. doi: 10.1136/jramc-145-02-09.
10
Quality and retrieval of obstetrical anaesthesia randomized controlled trials.产科麻醉随机对照试验的质量与检索
Can J Anaesth. 1997 Jan;44(1):14-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03014317.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.补充检索技术实证研究结果与综述方法手册推荐的比较:方法学综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;6(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0625-1.