Suppr超能文献

验证颈动脉张力测量法作为估计升主动脉压力增强指数的一种手段。

Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure.

作者信息

Chen C H, Ting C T, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass D A, Pak P, Wang S P, Chang M S, Yin F C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Republic of China.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1996 Feb;27(2):168-75. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168.

Abstract

Our objective was to validate a carotid artery tonometry-derived augmentation index as a means to estimate augmentation index (AI) of ascending aortic pressure under various physiological conditions. A total of 66 patients (50 men, 16 women; mean age, 55 years; range, 21 to 78 years; 44 in Taiwan and 22 in the United States) undergoing diagnostic catheterization were studied. Arterial pressure contours were obtained simultaneously from the right common carotid artery by applanation tonometry with an external micromanometer-tipped probe and from the ascending aorta by a micromanometer-tipped catheter at baseline (n = 62), after handgrip (n = 36), or after sublingual nitroglycerin administration (n = 17). The AI (expressed as percentage values) was calculated as the ratio of amplitude of the pressure wave above its systolic shoulder to the total pulse pressure. The carotid AI was consistently lower than the aortic AI, but the two were highly correlated at baseline and after both handgrip and nitroglycerin. Mean +/- SD and correlation coefficients were baseline (14 +/- 16, 28(+) +/- 17, .77), handgrip (18 +/- 19, 32(+) +/- 15, .86), and nitroglycerin (7 +/- 12, 18(+) +/- 13, .52). In addition, after adjusting for age, sex, height, blood pressure, heart rate, and study site, the changes of both AIs from baseline values with handgrip or nitroglycerin were highly associated such that the aortic AI could be approximated from the carotid AI with appropriate regression equations. The high correlations and predictable changes after interventions between the central AI and those estimated from noninvasive carotid tonometry suggest that this technique may have wide applicability for many cardiovascular studies.

摘要

我们的目标是验证一种通过颈动脉张力测定法得出的增强指数,以此作为在各种生理条件下估计升主动脉压力增强指数(AI)的一种方法。共对66例接受诊断性心导管检查的患者(50例男性,16例女性;平均年龄55岁;范围21至78岁;44例来自台湾,22例来自美国)进行了研究。在基线时(n = 62)、握力试验后(n = 36)或舌下含服硝酸甘油后(n = 17),使用外部微测压头探头通过压平式张力测定法从右颈总动脉同时获取动脉压力轮廓,并使用微测压头导管从升主动脉获取动脉压力轮廓。AI(以百分比值表示)计算为压力波高于其收缩期肩部的幅度与总脉压的比值。颈动脉AI始终低于主动脉AI,但在基线时以及握力试验和硝酸甘油给药后两者高度相关。平均值±标准差和相关系数分别为:基线时(14±16,28(+)±17,0.77)、握力试验后(18±19,32(+)±15,0.86)和硝酸甘油给药后(7±12,18(+)±13,0.52)。此外,在调整年龄、性别、身高、血压、心率和研究地点后,握力试验或硝酸甘油给药后两种AI相对于基线值的变化高度相关,因此可以使用适当的回归方程从颈动脉AI估算主动脉AI。中心AI与通过无创颈动脉张力测定法估计的AI之间在干预后的高相关性和可预测变化表明,该技术可能在许多心血管研究中具有广泛的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验