Sugawara Jun, Komine Hidehiko, Hayashi Koichiro, Maeda Seiji, Matsuda Mitsuo
Institute for Human Science and Bioengineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Hypertens. 2007 Feb;25(2):375-81. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32801092ae.
Increased aortic and carotid arterial augmentation index (AI) has been directly linked with cardiovascular disease risk, mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine whether AI obtained directly from radial artery pressure waveforms (radial AI) can provide information comparable with carotid arterial AI measurements.
In a cross-sectional study of 204 apparently healthy subjects (88 men and 116 women) aged 19-76 years (51 +/- 15 years, mean +/- SD), carotid AI [(second peak carotid systolic pressure - first peak carotid systolic pressure)/carotid pulse pressure*100] and radial AI [(second peak radial systolic pressure - diastolic pressure)/(first peak radial systolic pressure - diastolic pressure)*100] were measured using applanation tonometry.
Radial AI was strongly correlated with carotid AI (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001, SD of difference 10.0%), although radial AI was consistently approximately 66% higher than carotid AI. In 16 apparently healthy young adults (11 men and five women, aged 23 +/- 3 years) handgrip exercise was immediately followed by post-exercise muscle ischaemia (PEMI) to compare changes in carotid and radial AI during increased sympathetic nervous activity. PEMI caused parallel increases in carotid and radial AI (26 and 19%). Accordingly, changes in radial AI with PEMI were strongly correlated with corresponding changes in carotid AI (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001, SD of difference 7.3%).
These results suggest that AI obtained directly from radial arterial pressure waveforms could provide equivalent information to carotid arterial AI, and has potential as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease.
主动脉和颈动脉增强指数(AI)升高与心血管疾病风险、死亡率及发病率直接相关。本研究旨在探讨直接从桡动脉压力波形获取的AI(桡动脉AI)能否提供与颈动脉AI测量相当的信息。
在一项横断面研究中,纳入204名年龄在19 - 76岁(平均51±15岁,均值±标准差)的健康受试者(88名男性和116名女性),采用压平式眼压计测量颈动脉AI[(颈动脉收缩压第二峰 - 颈动脉收缩压第一峰)/颈动脉脉压×100]和桡动脉AI[(桡动脉收缩压第二峰 - 舒张压)/(桡动脉收缩压第一峰 - 舒张压)×100]。
桡动脉AI与颈动脉AI密切相关(r = 0.86,P < 0.0001,差值标准差为10.0%),尽管桡动脉AI始终比颈动脉AI高约66%。在16名明显健康的年轻成年人(11名男性和5名女性,年龄23±3岁)中,进行握力运动后紧接着出现运动后肌肉缺血(PEMI),以比较交感神经活动增强时颈动脉和桡动脉AI的变化。PEMI导致颈动脉和桡动脉AI平行升高(分别为26%和19%)。因此,PEMI引起的桡动脉AI变化与颈动脉AI的相应变化密切相关(r = 0.86,P < 0.0001,差值标准差为7.3%)。
这些结果表明,直接从桡动脉压力波形获取的AI可为颈动脉AI提供等效信息,并有潜力作为心血管疾病的替代标志物。