Minkler M
Int J Health Serv. 1977;7(2):237-48. doi: 10.2190/PGC3-AX2U-VLDG-RPN7.
The National Population Policy Statement adopted by the Government of India in April 1976 gave states the mandate to adopt coercive and compulsory sterilization measures toward the end of bringing under control the nation's massive population growth. Many states have since adopted stringent measures which penalize couples having three or more children, and four states additionally have proposed legislation for compulsory sterilization. While the demographic impact of compulsory sterilization after the third child is undisputed, the administrative feasibility of such and undertaking has been widely questioned, particularly in light of the inadequacy of India's medical infrastructure in the rural areas. Critics further have raised questions concerning the social and ethical implications of compulsory sterilization and of measures which penalize the poor through means which may have adverse effects on their health and welfare. Finally, opponents of the new sterilization measures have suggested that they divert attention from the need for more basic changes in the nation's economic and social structure. While the need for bringing down India's continued high birth rate is widely recognized, alternative population measures-e.g. increased abortion facilities and an enforcement of the raised age at marriage-have been advocated in lieu of the compulsory sterilization measures currently being proposed.
1976年4月印度政府通过的《国家人口政策声明》赋予各邦一项任务,即采取强制性绝育措施,以控制该国大规模的人口增长。自那时以来,许多邦都采取了严厉措施,对生育三个或三个以上孩子的夫妇进行惩罚,还有四个邦另外提出了强制绝育的立法提案。虽然第三个孩子之后强制绝育对人口结构的影响是无可争议的,但这样一项举措的行政可行性受到了广泛质疑,特别是考虑到印度农村地区医疗基础设施的不足。批评者还对强制绝育以及通过可能对穷人的健康和福利产生不利影响的手段惩罚穷人的措施所涉及的社会和伦理问题提出了质疑。最后,新绝育措施的反对者表示,这些措施转移了人们对国家经济和社会结构进行更基本变革需求的注意力。虽然人们普遍认识到需要降低印度持续居高不下的出生率,但有人主张采取替代性人口措施,例如增加堕胎设施以及执行提高结婚年龄的规定,以取代目前提议的强制绝育措施。