• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响植物间及植物与动物物种间牧草采食量预测的植物组成成分

Plant compositional constituents affecting between-plant and animal species prediction of forage intake.

作者信息

Meissner H H, Paulsmeier D V

机构信息

Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1995 Aug;73(8):2447-57. doi: 10.2527/1995.7382447x.

DOI:10.2527/1995.7382447x
PMID:8567482
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify plant compositional constituents that influence forage intake. Emphasis was put on the ratio in vitro digestibility of organic matter (IVDOM):NDF because preliminary work with cattle and a limited number of forages showed the ratio to account for more variation in intake than either IVDOM or NDF alone. The compositional constituents were tested in intake prediction models using local and published data (n = 302) on grass pastures, silages, hays, straws, legumes, grass-legume mixtures, and shrubs ingested by both browsing and grass-eating ruminants (goats, red deer, impala, blesbok, sheep, cattle, and blue wildebeest). In the local experiments, esophageally fistulated and fecal bag-harnessed animals were used to collect representative grazed forage samples from pastures and to determine OM excreted, respectively. Forage intake was calculated as OM excreted divided by (1-IVDOM). Intake of silages, hays, and straws was measured indoors in digestibility trials. Intakes among species were compared after scaling for size by BW raised to the power of .9. Major contributors to the variation in forage intake were ash, hemicellulose, IVDOM:NDF, ADL, and the interaction between DM content and, respectively, ash, N, and ADL. High tannin/phenol concentrations proved limiting to intake. The ratio of IVDOM:NDF accounted for 67% of the variation in forage intake if data for which the other constituents had an effect were omitted, and the equation, OMI, g.kg BW-.9.d-1 = 70-97e-.975(IVDOM:NDF), predicted intake across all forages and ruminant species with a Sy.x of 5.3 g.kg BW-.9.d-1 (CV = 15%). The ratio of IVDOM:NDF should be valuable as a relatively inexpensive and rapid method to screen forages and cultivars.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定影响采食量的植物组成成分。重点关注有机物体外消化率(IVDOM)与中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的比值,因为对牛和少量饲草的前期研究表明,该比值比单独的IVDOM或NDF能解释采食量更多的变异。使用本地和已发表的数据(n = 302)对组成成分进行采食量预测模型测试,这些数据涉及草牧场、青贮饲料、干草、秸秆、豆科植物、禾本科 - 豆科混合饲料以及被放牧和食草反刍动物(山羊、马鹿、黑斑羚、白纹牛羚、绵羊、牛和蓝角马)采食的灌木。在本地实验中,分别使用食管造瘘和佩戴粪袋的动物从牧场采集代表性的放牧饲草样本并测定排出的有机物。采食量计算为排出的有机物除以(1 - IVDOM)。青贮饲料、干草和秸秆的采食量在室内消化试验中进行测定。按体重的0.9次方进行大小校正后比较各物种间的采食量。采食量变异的主要影响因素是灰分、半纤维素、IVDOM:NDF、酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)以及干物质含量分别与灰分、氮和ADL之间的相互作用。高单宁/酚浓度被证明会限制采食量。如果省略其他成分有影响的数据,IVDOM:NDF的比值可解释采食量变异的67%,方程OMI,g.kg BW -0.9.d -1 = 70 - 97e -0.975(IVDOM:NDF)可预测所有饲草和反刍动物物种的采食量,其估计标准误Sy.x为5.3 g.kg BW -0.9.d -1(变异系数CV = 15%)。IVDOM:NDF的比值作为一种相对廉价且快速的饲草和品种筛选方法应具有重要价值。

相似文献

1
Plant compositional constituents affecting between-plant and animal species prediction of forage intake.影响植物间及植物与动物物种间牧草采食量预测的植物组成成分
J Anim Sci. 1995 Aug;73(8):2447-57. doi: 10.2527/1995.7382447x.
2
Comparative utilization of warm- and cool-season forages by cattle, sheep and goats.牛、羊和山羊对暖季和冷季草料的比较利用情况。
J Anim Sci. 1990 Sep;68(9):2986-94. doi: 10.2527/1990.6892986x.
3
Comparison of in vitro and in situ methods in evaluation of forage digestibility in ruminants.比较反刍动物饲料消化率的体外和体内方法。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Sep;90(9):3162-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4347. Epub 2012 May 14.
4
Effects of feeding level and NDF content of grass-clover silages on chewing activity, fecal particle size and NDF digestibility in dairy heifers.禾本科-三叶草青贮饲料的饲喂水平和中性洗涤纤维含量对奶牛咀嚼活动、粪便颗粒大小及中性洗涤纤维消化率的影响
Animal. 2014 Dec;8(12):1945-54. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002055. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Relationships between nutritive quality and fiber components of cool season and warm season forages: a retrospective study.冷季和暖季牧草营养品质与纤维成分之间的关系:一项回顾性研究。
J Anim Sci. 1988 May;66(5):1275-91. doi: 10.2527/jas1988.6651275x.
6
Comparative digestibility by cattle versus sheep: effect of forage quality.牛与羊的比较消化率:饲草质量的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Apr;92(4):1621-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6740. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
Estimation of feeding value of four tropical forage species at two stages of maturity.四种热带饲草在两个成熟阶段的饲用价值评估。
J Anim Sci. 2005 Jul;83(7):1726-31. doi: 10.2527/2005.8371726x.
8
Effect of lignin linkages with other plant cell wall components on in vitro and in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and rate of digestion of grass forages.木质素与其他植物细胞壁成分的连接对体外和体内中性洗涤剂纤维消化率以及牧草消化速度的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):8119-8131. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12364. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
Fecal Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy Prediction of the Feed Value of Temperate Forages for Ruminants and Some Parameters of the Chemical Composition of Feces: Efficiency of Four Calibration Strategies.粪便近红外反射光谱预测反刍动物温带牧草的饲料价值及粪便化学成分的某些参数:四种校正策略的效率。
Appl Spectrosc. 2017 Sep;71(9):2164-2176. doi: 10.1177/0003702817712740. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
Protein supplementation of ruminants consuming low-quality cool- or warm-season forage: differences in intake and digestibility.反刍动物采食低质冷季或暖季牧草时的蛋白质补充:采食量和消化率的差异。
J Anim Sci. 2011 Nov;89(11):3707-17. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3915. Epub 2011 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Seasonal restructuring facilitates compositional convergence of gut microbiota in free-ranging rodents.季节性重构促进了自由生活啮齿动物肠道微生物群落组成的趋同。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2023 Oct 17;99(11). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiad127.
2
The allometry of patch selection in ruminants.反刍动物斑块选择的异速生长
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):345-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007.