Adams M, Kutcher S, Antoniw E, Bird D
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Jan;35(1):67-73; discussion 73. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199601000-00014.
To determine the diagnostic utility of endocrine and neuroimaging screening tests in first-onset adolescent psychosis.
111 consecutively admitted adolescents (aged 13 through 19 years) who presented with a first-onset psychosis and who had an unremarkable medical history and normal physical examination were given a battery of endocrine and neuroimaging screening tests. Diagnostic utility of a screening test was defined as an abnormal result (a positive test) that either led to a previously unknown or unsuspected medical diagnosis or played an important role in the clinical care of the patient.
15.4% of the endocrine screening tests and 11.0% of the neuroimaging screening tests were identified as positive. However, no endocrine and no neuroimaging tests met criteria for diagnostic utility. The direct cost of this screening battery was $636.95 per patient.
Routine endocrine and neuroimaging screening tests in first-onset adolescent psychosis provide no diagnostic utility and are not cost-effective. Selective use of appropriate endocrine and neuroimaging diagnostic tests in populations with symptoms suggestive of organic disorders should replace routine screening procedures.
确定内分泌和神经影像学筛查试验在初发青少年精神病中的诊断效用。
对111例连续入院的青少年(年龄在13至19岁之间)进行了一系列内分泌和神经影像学筛查试验,这些青少年患有初发精神病,病史无异常且体格检查正常。筛查试验的诊断效用定义为异常结果(阳性试验),该结果要么导致先前未知或未怀疑的医学诊断,要么在患者的临床护理中发挥重要作用。
15.4%的内分泌筛查试验和11.0%的神经影像学筛查试验被确定为阳性。然而,没有内分泌和神经影像学检查符合诊断效用标准。该筛查组合的直接成本为每位患者636.95美元。
初发青少年精神病的常规内分泌和神经影像学筛查试验没有诊断效用,且不具有成本效益。在有提示器质性疾病症状的人群中选择性使用适当的内分泌和神经影像学诊断试验应取代常规筛查程序。