• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受培训的医生所报告的行为是否与伦理共识指南相冲突?

Do actions reported by physicians in training conflict with consensus guidelines on ethics?

作者信息

Green M J, Mitchell G, Stocking C B, Cassel C K, Siegler M

机构信息

MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Ill, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 12;156(3):298-304.

PMID:8572840
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent to which actions reported by internal medicine trainees conflict with published guidelines on ethics.

METHODS

A confidential survey was sent to a random sample (N = 1000) of associate members of the American College of Physicians (ACP). Questions were asked about ethical decision making in areas addressed by the guidelines in the ACP Ethics Manual. Quoted manual guidelines were provided, followed by 55 yes or no questions, such that a yes answer represented an action that conflicted with a guideline. There were two follow-up mailings to nonresponders.

RESULTS

Forty percent (n = 397) completed the questionnaire; 17% indicated they were aware of the guidelines on ethics. On average, associates responded yes to 16% of questions where a yes response indicated they have acted outside guidelines on ethics one or more times. The mean number of responses (n = 55) that conflicted with a guideline was 7.6 per person (SD, 4.7 responses; range, 0 to 33 responses). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported actions falling outside a guideline one or more times and 80% did so four or more times. The most frequently reported reason (965/3219 [30%]) from a list of four choices for acting outside a guideline was "I was aware of the guideline, but this did not represent an ethical dilemma to me."

CONCLUSIONS

Few responding ACP associates indicated awareness of the ACP guidelines on ethics. Physicians in training nevertheless reported acting according to the presented guidelines most of the time, although nearly all respondents acted outside a guideline at least once, and some did so many times. Reported behaviors were sometimes inconsistent with consensus ethical standards that apply to internists. Physicians in training need to know more about ethical standards that apply to their own practice and should be aware when their actions deviate from ethical norms. Before acting outside guidelines on ethics, trainees should discuss their conflicts with others, such as attending physicians, clinical ethicists, or hospital ethics committees.

摘要

目的

评估内科实习医生报告的行为与已发表的伦理准则冲突的程度。

方法

向美国医师协会(ACP)准会员的随机样本(N = 1000)发送了一份保密调查问卷。询问了关于ACP伦理手册中准则所涉及领域的伦理决策问题。提供了手册中的引用准则,随后是55个是或否的问题,回答“是”表示该行为与准则冲突。对未回复者进行了两次跟进邮寄。

结果

40%(n = 397)完成了问卷;17%表示他们知晓伦理准则。平均而言,准会员对16%的问题回答“是”,回答“是”表明他们曾一次或多次做出违反伦理准则的行为。与准则冲突的回答平均数(n = 55)为每人7.6个(标准差,4.7个回答;范围,0至33个回答)。98%的受访者报告曾一次或多次做出违反准则的行为,80%的受访者这样做过四次或更多次。在列出的违反准则行为的四个选择原因中,最常被报告的原因(965/3219 [30%])是“我知晓该准则,但这对我来说不构成伦理困境”。

结论

很少有回复的ACP准会员表示知晓ACP伦理准则。然而,接受培训的医生报告称,他们大多数时候是按照所提供的准则行事的,尽管几乎所有受访者都至少有一次做出了违反准则的行为,有些受访者还多次这样做。报告的行为有时与适用于内科医生的共识性伦理标准不一致。接受培训的医生需要更多地了解适用于他们自身执业的伦理标准,并且应该意识到他们的行为何时偏离了伦理规范。在做出违反伦理准则的行为之前,实习生应该与他人讨论他们的冲突,比如主治医生、临床伦理学家或医院伦理委员会。

相似文献

1
Do actions reported by physicians in training conflict with consensus guidelines on ethics?接受培训的医生所报告的行为是否与伦理共识指南相冲突?
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 12;156(3):298-304.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
New and lingering controversies in pediatric end-of-life care.儿科临终关怀领域新出现且持续存在的争议。
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):872-83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0905.
4
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
5
How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.医生如何面对伦理困境:一项定性分析。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):7-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005835.
6
Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.非特异性实践指南是否有潜在危害?非特异性指南与特异性指南对医生决策影响的随机对照比较。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1429-48.
7
Abortion training in family practice residency programs.家庭医学住院医师培训项目中的堕胎培训。
Fam Med. 1996 Apr;28(4):245-8.
8
The preparedness of schools to respond to emergencies in children: a national survey of school nurses.学校应对儿童紧急情况的准备情况:一项针对学校护士的全国性调查。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e738-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1474.
9
Use of treatment guidelines in clinical decision making in bipolar disorder: a pilot survey of clinicians.双相情感障碍临床决策中治疗指南的应用:临床医生的初步调查
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Mar;23(3):467-75. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167444.
10
The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.专家共识指南系列。优化精神障碍的药物治疗。引言:方法、评论与总结。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 12:5-19.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical junior: a typology of ethical problems faced by house officers.有道德的实习生:住院医生面临的道德问题类型
J R Soc Med. 2008 Feb;101(2):67-70. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2007.070412.
2
"Cold calling" in psychiatric follow up studies: is it justified?精神科随访研究中的“主动联系”:是否合理?
J Med Ethics. 2003 Aug;29(4):238-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.4.238.