Radko S P, Chrambach A
Section on Macromolecular Analysis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1855, USA.
Appl Theor Electrophor. 1995;5(2):79-87.
The previous postulate of collision and displacement mechanisms of molecular sieving based on a biphasic plot of retardation coefficient vs particle radius ("R-plot") was extended and modified in four ways: i) A wider size range of particles and polymers confirmed the biphasic nature of the R-plot and, in addition, revealed a third mechanistic phase in the largest size range of particles and polymers which exhibits a positive slope in plots of retardation coefficient vs log (particle or polymer size), presumably denoting a collision mechanism. ii) Peaks of retardation in polyethyleneglycol (PEG) solutions were found with a particle M(r) of 10(7) independently of the M(r) of PEG, and with a PEG M(r) of 4 x 10(5) independently of particle M(r), showing that the retardation mechanism is not qualitatively a function of the particle/polymer size ratio as postulated previously, although quantitatively retardation is directly related to the size of particle and polymer. iii) Items i) and ii) were confirmed using band width in lieu of mobility measurement. iv) The entanglement threshold, c*, was found to decrease monotonically across the entire polymer size range in which the triphasic retardation takes place. Thus c* cannot be the sole cause for a non-monotonic change of retardation or normalized relative bandwidth with polymer size and particle size. Moreover, Ferguson plots across c* do not reflect it in any way.
基于阻滞系数与颗粒半径的双相图(“R-图”)的分子筛碰撞和位移机制的先前假设在四个方面得到了扩展和修正:i)更宽的颗粒和聚合物尺寸范围证实了R-图的双相性质,此外,还揭示了在最大尺寸范围的颗粒和聚合物中的第三个机制阶段,其在阻滞系数与对数(颗粒或聚合物尺寸)的图中呈现正斜率,推测表示碰撞机制。ii)在聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液中发现,当颗粒的相对分子质量(M(r))为10(7)时,阻滞峰的出现与PEG的M(r)无关;当PEG的M(r)为4×10(5)时,阻滞峰的出现与颗粒M(r)无关,这表明阻滞机制在性质上并非如先前假设的那样是颗粒/聚合物尺寸比的函数,尽管在数量上阻滞与颗粒和聚合物的尺寸直接相关。iii)使用带宽代替迁移率测量证实了i)和ii)项。iv)发现在发生三相阻滞的整个聚合物尺寸范围内,缠结阈值c单调下降。因此,c不可能是阻滞或归一化相对带宽随聚合物尺寸和颗粒尺寸非单调变化的唯一原因。此外,跨越c*的弗格森图并未以任何方式反映这一点。