• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构-气味关系:利用神经网络评估脂肪醇的樟脑气味或水果气味以及嗅觉阈值

Structure-odor relationships: using neural networks in the estimation of camphoraceous or fruity odors and olfactory thresholds of aliphatic alcohols.

作者信息

Chastrette M, Cretin D, el Aïdi C

机构信息

Laboratoire de Chimie Organique Physique et Synthétique, URA 463, Université Claude Bernard, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1996 Jan-Feb;36(1):108-13. doi: 10.1021/ci950154b.

DOI:10.1021/ci950154b
PMID:8576286
Abstract

Structure-odor relationships were established for a sample of 99 aliphatic alcohols using a three-layer backpropagation neural network. The molecular structure was described using a common skeleton with six possible substitutions. Substituents were described using only their van der Waals volumes. The discrimination between fruity and camphoraceous odors of 67 compounds gave good results in classification (100%) and prediction (85%) phases. With the global set, the network correctly classified and predicted the camphoraceous character of compounds (100% and 95% respectively) but gave poorer results for the fruity character (87% and 74% respectively). Calculations of pOLs (pOL = -log (olfactory threshold expressed in mol/L)) of 45 camphoraceous compounds were also made. When all camphoraceous compounds were used to establish the model, 91% of the pOLs were correctly estimated. When attempts were made to predict the pOL values of 10% of the compounds from a model designed using 90% of the sample, only 74% of the pOLs were correctly estimated.

摘要

使用三层反向传播神经网络,为99种脂肪醇的样本建立了结构-气味关系。分子结构通过具有六种可能取代基的常见骨架来描述。取代基仅用其范德华体积来描述。对67种化合物的果香和樟脑气味进行区分,在分类(100%)和预测(85%)阶段都取得了良好的结果。对于整个数据集,该网络正确分类并预测了化合物的樟脑特性(分别为100%和95%),但对果香特性的预测结果较差(分别为87%和74%)。还对45种樟脑类化合物的pOLs(pOL = -log(以mol/L表示的嗅觉阈值))进行了计算。当使用所有樟脑类化合物建立模型时,91%的pOLs得到了正确估计。当尝试从使用90%样本设计的模型预测10%化合物的pOL值时,只有74%的pOLs得到了正确估计。

相似文献

1
Structure-odor relationships: using neural networks in the estimation of camphoraceous or fruity odors and olfactory thresholds of aliphatic alcohols.结构-气味关系:利用神经网络评估脂肪醇的樟脑气味或水果气味以及嗅觉阈值
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1996 Jan-Feb;36(1):108-13. doi: 10.1021/ci950154b.
2
Spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) are less sensitive to the odor of aliphatic ketones than to the odor of other classes of aliphatic compounds.蜘蛛猴(Ateles geoffroyi)对脂肪族酮类气味的敏感度低于对其他脂肪族化合物气味的敏感度。
Neurosci Res. 2015 Oct;99:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
3
Olfactory discrimination of structurally similar alcohols by cockroaches.蟑螂对结构相似的醇类的嗅觉辨别能力。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Nov;188(10):787-97. doi: 10.1007/s00359-002-0366-y. Epub 2002 Nov 7.
4
Olfactory sensitivity for "green odors" (aliphatic C(6) alcohols and C(6) aldehydes)--a comparative study in male CD-1 mice (Mus musculus) and female spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).“绿色气味”(脂肪族 C(6)醇和 C(6)醛)的嗅觉敏感性——雄性 CD-1 小鼠(Mus musculus)和雌性蜘蛛猴(Ateles geoffroyi)的比较研究。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 May;101(3):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
5
Odor structure-activity relationships compared in human and nonhuman primates.人类和非人类灵长类动物中气味结构-活性关系的比较
Behav Neurosci. 1999 Oct;113(5):998-1007. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.5.998.
6
Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic c6 alcohols as a function of presence, position, and configuration of a double bond.作为双键的存在、位置和构型的函数,脂族C6醇的嗅觉辨别能力。
Chem Senses. 2005 Nov;30(9):755-60. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bji067. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
7
Odor detection and odor discrimination in subadult and adult rats for two enantiomeric odorants supported by c-fos data.亚成年和成年大鼠对两种对映体气味的气味检测和辨别能力,基于 c-fos 数据的支持。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jan 20;206(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.09.022. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
8
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.气味感知不能作为化学暴露的替代标志物:影响人类气味感知的因素综述。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908.
9
Affected by smells? Environmental chemical responsivity predicts odor perception.受气味影响?环境化学反应性预测嗅觉感知。
Chem Senses. 2011 Sep;36(7):641-8. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr028. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
10
Olfactory sensitivity and odor structure-activity relationships for aliphatic ketones in CD-1 mice.CD-1小鼠中脂肪族酮类的嗅觉敏感性及气味构效关系
Chem Senses. 2014 Jun;39(5):415-24. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju011. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Malted Chickpea on the Composition of Volatiles in Hummus.麦芽鹰嘴豆对鹰嘴豆泥中挥发性成分组成的影响。
Molecules. 2025 Mar 10;30(6):1231. doi: 10.3390/molecules30061231.
2
OWSum: algorithmic odor prediction and insight into structure-odor relationships.OWSum:算法气味预测与结构-气味关系洞察
J Cheminform. 2023 May 7;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13321-023-00722-y.
3
Predicting odor from molecular structure: a multi-label classification approach.从分子结构预测气味:一种多标签分类方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18086-y.
4
Smell compounds classification using UMAP to increase knowledge of odors and molecular structures linkages.使用 UMAP 进行气味化合物分类,以增加对气味和分子结构联系的了解。
PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252486. eCollection 2021.
5
Is It Possible to Predict the Odor of a Molecule on the Basis of its Structure?是否有可能根据分子结构预测其气味?
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 20;20(12):3018. doi: 10.3390/ijms20123018.
6
Understanding the Odour Spaces: A Step towards Solving Olfactory Stimulus-Percept Problem.理解气味空间:迈向解决嗅觉刺激-感知问题的一步。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0141263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141263. eCollection 2015.