Mauguière F, Isnard J
Service de Neurologie Fonctionnelle et d'Epileptologie, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1995 Aug-Sep;151(8-9):518-27.
The question as to whether a failure of recognition unrelated to impaired sensory processing or to disorder of naming can occur in the somato-sensory modality has been eagerly debated in the french neurology. Taking as an argument the fact that he had never observed a tactile agnosia in the absence of subtle sensory deficits Dejerine denied the localizing value of tactile agnosia (or asterognosis). Conversely Delay, 20 years later, identified tactile performances such as discrimination of texture and shapes, which he considered as a specific neocortical function, that were lost in parietal syndromes with astereognosis and preserved elementary sensations. He also coined the term "tactile asymbolia" to qualify the patients with astereognosis in whom these performances are preserved. When referring to the definition of agnosias only "tactile asymbolia" should be considered as a "true" tactile agnosia. The recording of early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) now offers the possibility of assessing non invasively the function of the primary somatosensory cortex (in particular area 3b). We have recorded SEPs to median nerve or finger stimulation in 309 subjects with a focal hemispheric lesion presenting with a somatosensory deficit of any type. We could confirm that asterognosis referable to impaired discrimination of textures and/or shapes in the absence of impaired elementary sensation is quite rare since it was observed in only 12 of our patients (3.9%). Moreover early cortical SEPs reflecting the activity of the primary somatosensory area (N20 or/and P27) were clearly abnormal in all of them. A single patient of this group of 12 could be considered as a case of tactile asymbolia but his early cortical SEPs were abnormal. The only condition combining a failure of tactile recognition of objects with normal early SEPs is represented by the "tactile anomia" observed in callosal dysconnexions. Thus, in our patients unable to identify objects by palpation in spite of preserved elementary sensation, we were unable to identify a case of pure tactile agnosia. These results are to be confronted with the recent observation by Caselli (1991, 1993) that tactile object recognition is partially, but selectively, impaired in inferior parietal lesions supposed to disconnect the ventrolateral associative somatosensory cortex from its limbic targets.
在法国神经学界,关于体感模式下是否会出现与感觉加工受损或命名障碍无关的识别障碍这一问题一直备受热议。德热里纳以自己从未观察到无轻微感觉缺陷的触觉失认症这一事实为论据,否认了触觉失认症(或实体觉失认)的定位价值。相反,20年后,德莱发现了诸如质地和形状辨别等触觉表现,他认为这是一种特定的新皮质功能,在伴有实体觉失认和基本感觉保留的顶叶综合征中会丧失。他还创造了“触觉失用症”一词来描述那些实体觉失认但这些表现仍保留的患者。当提及失认症的定义时,只有“触觉失用症”应被视为一种“真正的”触觉失认症。早期体感诱发电位(SEP)的记录现在提供了一种非侵入性评估初级体感皮层(特别是3b区)功能的可能性。我们对309例有局灶性半球病变且伴有任何类型体感缺陷表现的受试者进行了正中神经或手指刺激下的SEP记录。我们可以证实,在基本感觉未受损的情况下,因质地和/或形状辨别受损导致的实体觉失认相当罕见,因为在我们的患者中仅观察到12例(3.9%)。此外,反映初级体感区活动的早期皮层SEP(N20或/和P27)在所有这些患者中均明显异常。这12例患者中仅有1例可被视为触觉失用症病例,但他的早期皮层SEP也是异常的。唯一一种将物体触觉识别障碍与早期SEP正常相结合的情况是在胼胝体连接障碍中观察到的“触觉命名障碍”。因此,在我们那些尽管基本感觉保留但仍无法通过触摸识别物体的患者中,我们未能识别出一例纯粹的触觉失认症病例。这些结果与卡塞利(1991年、1993年)最近的观察结果形成对比,即在下顶叶病变中,触觉物体识别会部分但有选择性地受损,这种病变被认为会使腹外侧联合体感皮层与其边缘靶点断开连接。