Guyer R D, Ohnmeiss D D
Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas, and the Institute for Spine and Biomedical Research, Plano, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Sep 15;20(18):2048-59.
A comprehensive review of the literature dealing with lumbar discography was conducted.
The purpose of the review was to generate a position statement addressing criticisms of lumbar discography, identify indications for its use, and describe a technique for its performance.
Lumbar discography remains a controversial diagnostic procedure. There are concerns about its safety and clinical value, although others support its use in specific applications.
Articles dealing with lumbar discography were reviewed and summarized in this report.
Most of the recent literature supports the use of discography in select patients. Although not to be taken lightly, many of the serious and high complication rates were reported before 1970 and have decreased since because of improvement in injection technique, imaging, and contrast materials.
Most of the current literature supports the use of discography in select situations. Particular applications include patients with persistent pain in whom disc abnormality is suspect, but noninvasive tests have not provided sufficient diagnostic information or the images need to be correlated with clinical symptoms. Another application is assessment of discs in patients in whom fusion is being considered. Discography's role in such cases is to determine if discs within the proposed fusion segment are symptomatic and if the adjacent discs are normal. Discography appears to be helpful in patients who have previously undergone surgery but continue to experience significant pain. In such cases, it can be used to differentiate between postoperative scar and recurrent disc herniation and to investigate the condition of a disc within, or adjacent to, a fused spinal segment to better delineate the source of symptoms. When minimally invasive discectomy is being considered, discography can be used to confirm a contained disc herniation, which is generally an indication for such surgical procedures. Lumbar discography should be performed by those well experienced with the procedure and in sterile conditions with a double needle technique and fluoroscopic imaging for proper needle placement. Information assessed and recorded should include the volume of contrast injected, pain response with particular emphasis on its location and similarity to clinical symptoms, and the pattern of dye distribution. Frequently, discography is followed by axial computed tomography scanning to obtain more information about the condition of the disc.
对有关腰椎间盘造影术的文献进行了全面综述。
本综述的目的是生成一份立场声明,回应对腰椎间盘造影术的批评,确定其使用指征,并描述其操作技术。
腰椎间盘造影术仍是一种存在争议的诊断方法。尽管有人支持其在特定应用中的使用,但人们对其安全性和临床价值仍存在担忧。
本报告对有关腰椎间盘造影术的文章进行了综述和总结。
最近的大多数文献支持在特定患者中使用椎间盘造影术。尽管不能掉以轻心,但许多严重和高并发症发生率是在1970年之前报告的,此后由于注射技术、成像和造影剂的改进而有所下降。
当前的大多数文献支持在特定情况下使用椎间盘造影术。具体应用包括怀疑椎间盘异常但无创检查未提供足够诊断信息或图像需要与临床症状相关联的持续性疼痛患者。另一个应用是对考虑进行融合手术的患者的椎间盘进行评估。椎间盘造影术在此类病例中的作用是确定拟融合节段内的椎间盘是否有症状以及相邻椎间盘是否正常。椎间盘造影术似乎对先前接受过手术但仍有明显疼痛的患者有帮助。在此类病例中,它可用于区分术后瘢痕和复发性椎间盘突出,并调查融合脊柱节段内或相邻节段的椎间盘状况,以更好地确定症状来源。在考虑进行微创椎间盘切除术时,椎间盘造影术可用于确认包容性椎间盘突出,这通常是此类手术的指征。腰椎间盘造影术应由对此操作经验丰富的人员在无菌条件下采用双针技术并借助荧光透视成像以正确放置针头来进行。评估和记录的信息应包括注入造影剂的量、疼痛反应,尤其要强调其位置以及与临床症状的相似性,以及染料分布模式。通常,椎间盘造影术后会进行轴向计算机断层扫描以获取有关椎间盘状况的更多信息。