Louboutin J P, Fichter-Gagnepain V, Pastoret C, Thaon E, Noireaud J, Sébille A, Fardeau M
Unité CNRS 1340. Hôpital GR Laënnec-BP 1005 Nantes, France.
Neuromuscul Disord. 1995 Nov;5(6):489-500. doi: 10.1016/0960-8966(95)00006-9.
The regenerative capacity of mdx Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL) muscle after iterative muscle crush injuries was examined and compared with that of age-matched control C57BL/10 mice. Muscle crush injuries were performed at 8 weeks and repeated at 12 and 16 weeks. Contralateral non-crushed EDLs from mdx and C57BL/10 mice were used as internal controls for histopathology, histoenzymology, morphometry and for the study of the contractile properties. Morphological examinations were performed at 12, 16 and 20 weeks, respectively one month after a single, a second or a third crush. Contractile properties were studied at 12 to 20 weeks. By 20 weeks, no difference in the number of fibres with internal nuclei could be observed between crushed EDL from both strains, and non-crushed mdx EDL; the area and the diameter of crushed EDL from mdx mice were, respectively, 1.5- and 1.2-fold higher than the ones from crushed EDL from C57BL/10 strain. By 20 weeks, diameter distribution of crushed EDL muscles from C57BL/10 mice were shifted towards smaller fibre diameter, whereas in mdx mice, diameter distribution of crushed EDL muscles paralleled that of non-crushed EDL muscles. By 20 weeks, crushed mdx and C57BL/10 EDL muscles produced 77 and 47% of normalized tetanus tension respectively of non-crushed mdx and C57BL/10 EDL muscles. Following crush injury, both 12- and 20-week mdx and C57BL/10 EDL exhibited a slowed time to peak (TTP) and half-relaxation time (H1/2R) of twitch. There was no difference in posttetanic potentiation between the different groups. Crushed EDL of both strains showed an increased resistance to fatigue, compared to the non-crushed controls. The present study provides morphological and functional evidence for the greater recovery of mdx muscle compared to C57BL/10 muscle following iterative crush injury; however, the recovery does not completely prevent the appearance of necrosis/regeneration features.
研究了mdx小鼠伸趾长肌(EDL)在反复肌肉挤压损伤后的再生能力,并与年龄匹配的对照C57BL/10小鼠进行了比较。在8周龄时进行肌肉挤压损伤,并在12周和16周龄时重复进行。来自mdx和C57BL/10小鼠的对侧未挤压EDL用作组织病理学、组织酶学、形态计量学以及收缩特性研究的内部对照。分别在12周、16周和20周进行形态学检查,即在单次、第二次或第三次挤压后一个月进行检查。在12至20周龄时研究收缩特性。到20周时,两种品系挤压后的EDL与未挤压的mdx EDL相比,在具有内部细胞核的纤维数量上没有差异;mdx小鼠挤压后的EDL的面积和直径分别比C57BL/10品系挤压后的EDL高1.5倍和1.2倍。到20周时,C57BL/10小鼠挤压后的EDL肌肉的直径分布向较小的纤维直径偏移,而在mdx小鼠中,挤压后的EDL肌肉的直径分布与未挤压的EDL肌肉相似。到20周时,挤压后的mdx和C57BL/10 EDL肌肉分别产生未挤压的mdx和C57BL/10 EDL肌肉正常化强直张力的77%和47%。挤压损伤后,12周龄和20周龄的mdx和C57BL/10 EDL的单收缩达到峰值时间(TTP)和半松弛时间(H1/2R)均减慢。不同组之间的强直后增强没有差异。与未挤压的对照相比,两种品系挤压后的EDL均表现出对疲劳的抵抗力增加。本研究提供了形态学和功能学证据,表明与C57BL/10肌肉相比,mdx肌肉在反复挤压损伤后恢复得更好;然而,这种恢复并不能完全防止坏死/再生特征的出现。