Tobin D L, Griffing A S
Tufts University Medical School, MA, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 1995 Dec;18(4):359-63. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199512)18:4<359::aid-eat2260180409>3.0.co;2-a.
While theoretical models of bulimia have tended to emphasize single dimensions of the disorder, such as cognition or depression, factor analytic studies suggest that bulimia is best represented by a multifactorial model. In this study, we explore whether bulimia nervosa patients with different levels of depression display different types of coping.
Bulimia nervosa clinic patients were divided into four subgroups based on level of depression and asked to respond to the Coping Strategies Inventory.
The results suggest that avoidant or disengaged coping may be more related to affective symptoms than to bulimia, itself. While problem solving and cognitive restructuring did not appear to differ between the subgroups in this study, there were significant differences in social support seeking among the four groups.
The findings suggest that bulimic patients who present with the affective and personality disordered dimension of bulimia need interventions that focus on the utilization of social support.
虽然暴食症的理论模型倾向于强调该疾病的单一维度,如认知或抑郁,但因素分析研究表明,暴食症最好用多因素模型来表示。在本研究中,我们探讨了不同抑郁水平的神经性暴食症患者是否表现出不同类型的应对方式。
神经性暴食症门诊患者根据抑郁水平分为四个亚组,并要求他们对应对策略量表做出反应。
结果表明,回避或脱离应对方式可能与情感症状的关系比与暴食症本身的关系更大。虽然本研究中亚组之间的解决问题和认知重构方式似乎没有差异,但四组之间在寻求社会支持方面存在显著差异。
研究结果表明,表现出暴食症情感和人格障碍维度的暴食症患者需要侧重于利用社会支持的干预措施。