Lellé R J, Heidenreich W, Lück H J, Schneider J
Frauenklinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1995 Dec;55(12):695-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022316.
The Morley incision is much less frequently used than the Pfannenstiel technique. Dividing the rectus muscle during laparotomy has both the advantages of the Pfannenstiel incision (good exposure of the pelvic organs, cosmetic appearance, decreased risk of hernia formation) as well as those of the midline approach (access to the upper abdomen). Between October 1992 and April 1994, the Morley technique was used in 73 cases. In 33 patients, radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma was performed. In 40 patients, the Morley incision was used for treatment of carcinoma of the endometrium (20), ovarian masses (16), large fibroids (3) or marked obesity (1). The rate of secondary wound healing was 10%. On patient required hernia repair. No postoperative bleeding and no haematomas were observed. The Morley technique is an excellent alternative to the standard midline incision whenever optimal exposure of the pelvic viscera is required as well as an acceptable access to the upper abdomen.
莫利切口的使用频率远低于Pfannenstiel技术。剖腹手术时切开腹直肌兼具Pfannenstiel切口的优点(盆腔脏器暴露良好、美观、疝形成风险降低)以及中线入路的优点(可进入上腹部)。1992年10月至1994年4月期间,73例患者采用了莫利技术。33例患者因宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术。40例患者采用莫利切口治疗子宫内膜癌(20例)、卵巢肿块(16例)、大子宫肌瘤(3例)或显著肥胖(1例)。二期伤口愈合率为10%。1例患者需要进行疝修补。未观察到术后出血和血肿。只要需要最佳暴露盆腔脏器以及可接受的进入上腹部的途径,莫利技术是标准中线切口的极佳替代方法。