• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用临床护理路径的经济高效性根治性前列腺切除术。

Cost-efficient radical prostatectomy with a clinical care path.

作者信息

Litwin M S, Smith R B, Thind A, Reccius N, Blanco-Yarosh M, deKernion J B

机构信息

Department of Surgery/Urology (School of Medicine), University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 Mar;155(3):989-93.

PMID:8583624
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed changes in hospital costs and resource use among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy following implementation of a clinical care path.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardized clinical care path for patient management before and after radical prostatectomy was developed and implemented at a large academic medical center in California. All 577 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the 3 years before and 1 year after implementation of the care path were included in the study. Each patient was entered prospectively into a hospital-wide financial data base, which served as the source for observations on hospital costs, hospital charges and length of stay.

RESULTS

After implementation of the radical prostatectomy care path hospital costs decreased by 12% ($7,916 versus $6,934, p < 0.001), hospital charges decreased by 20% ($17,005 versus $13,524, p < 0.0001) and length of stay decreased by 28% (5 versus 3.6 days, p < 0.0001). Decreases were noted in all categories of the hospital patient financial profile, except operating room charges.

CONCLUSIONS

By standardizing preoperative and postoperative management for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, significant savings can be achieved over and above existing trends toward shorter hospital stays and lower hospital costs.

摘要

目的

我们评估了实施临床护理路径后接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的医院成本和资源使用变化。

材料与方法

在加利福尼亚州的一家大型学术医疗中心制定并实施了根治性前列腺切除术前后患者管理的标准化临床护理路径。纳入了护理路径实施前3年和实施后1年期间连续接受根治性前列腺切除术的所有577例患者。每位患者前瞻性地录入医院范围的财务数据库,该数据库作为观察医院成本、医院收费和住院时间的来源。

结果

实施根治性前列腺切除术护理路径后,医院成本降低了12%(从7916美元降至6934美元,p<0.001),医院收费降低了20%(从17005美元降至13524美元,p<0.0001),住院时间缩短了28%(从5天降至3.6天,p<0.0001)。除手术室收费外,医院患者财务概况的所有类别均出现下降。

结论

通过对接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的术前和术后管理进行标准化,除了现有住院时间缩短和医院成本降低的趋势外,还可实现显著的节约。

相似文献

1
Cost-efficient radical prostatectomy with a clinical care path.采用临床护理路径的经济高效性根治性前列腺切除术。
J Urol. 1996 Mar;155(3):989-93.
2
Impact of physician awareness on hospital charges for radical retropubic prostatectomy.医生认知对耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术医院收费的影响。
J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):139-42.
3
Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与经会阴根治性前列腺切除术的成本比较:单机构经验
Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.007.
4
Maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction with radical prostatectomy in the era of cost containment.在成本控制时代维持前列腺癌根治术的医疗质量和患者满意度。
Urology. 1996 Aug;48(2):269-76. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00160-4.
5
[Development of a clinical pathway for radical prostatectomy].[根治性前列腺切除术临床路径的制定]
Arch Esp Urol. 1999 Dec;52(10):1051-9.
6
Effects of hospital procedure volume and resident training on clinical outcomes and resource use in radical retropubic prostatectomy surgery in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中医院手术量和住院医师培训对临床结局及资源利用的影响。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):272-8; discussion 278-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.149. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
[The perioperative charge equivalence of radical prostatectomy with 1-year follow up since the diagnosis of prostate cancer].[自前列腺癌诊断起进行1年随访的根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期费用等效性]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2004 Feb;50(2):71-5.
8
Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.腹腔镜前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的成本比较
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):557-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.016.
9
The perioperative charge equivalence of interstitial brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy with 1-year followup.间质近距离放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术围手术期费用等效性及1年随访
J Urol. 2000 Feb;163(2):511-4.
10
Charge and length of hospital stay analysis of radical retropubic prostatectomy and transperineal prostate brachytherapy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与经会阴前列腺近距离放射治疗的费用及住院时间分析
J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1216-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches.根治性前列腺切除术的费用:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术方法的回顾性比较。
J Robot Surg. 2008 May;2(1):21-4. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0052-8. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
2
Enhanced recovery pathway for radical prostatectomy: Implementation and evaluation in a universal healthcare system.根治性前列腺切除术的强化康复路径:在全民医疗保健系统中的实施与评估
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):418-23. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2114.
3
Cost effectiveness of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for the prevention of prostate cancer in multiple patient populations.
5α-还原酶抑制剂预防多种患者人群前列腺癌的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):489-505. doi: 10.2165/11531780-000000000-00000.
4
Compliance and efficiency before and after implementation of a clinical practice guideline for laryngeal carcinomas.喉癌临床实践指南实施前后的依从性和效率
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Aug;263(8):729-37. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0062-6. Epub 2006 May 14.
5
The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌的经济成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(13):869-78. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220130-00001.