• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童术前用药:口服咪达唑仑与直肠用溴西泮的比较

[Premedication in children: a comparison of oral midazolam and rectal bromazepam].

作者信息

Kambara N, Kitamura S, Taniguchi A, Hamao W, Matsuyama M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Children's Medical Center.

出版信息

Masui. 1995 Dec;44(12):1707-11.

PMID:8583673
Abstract

Seventy-seven children for minor surgery of less than 90 minutes in duration were divided into two groups; one group received midazolam syrup and the other received bromazepam suppository. The sedative effect before or after the induction of the anesthetic, the effect on the circulatory system, and the prolongation of the sedative effect after surgery were studied. Regarding the sedative effect before or during the induction of anesthesia, both medications were effective with no significant difference between the two groups. However, the bromazepam suppository had a significantly better sedative effect 1 or 2 hours after the surgery. In children under 4 years of age, the sedative effect during the induction was obtained by administering midazolam syrup before the surgery. It is indicated that midazolam syrup is superior to the bromazepam suppository in children under 4 years of age.

摘要

77名接受持续时间少于90分钟小手术的儿童被分为两组;一组接受咪达唑仑糖浆,另一组接受溴西泮栓剂。研究了麻醉诱导前或后的镇静效果、对循环系统的影响以及术后镇静效果的延长情况。关于麻醉诱导前或期间的镇静效果,两种药物均有效,两组之间无显著差异。然而,溴西泮栓剂在术后1或2小时具有明显更好的镇静效果。在4岁以下儿童中,通过术前给予咪达唑仑糖浆获得诱导期间的镇静效果。表明咪达唑仑糖浆在4岁以下儿童中优于溴西泮栓剂。

相似文献

1
[Premedication in children: a comparison of oral midazolam and rectal bromazepam].儿童术前用药:口服咪达唑仑与直肠用溴西泮的比较
Masui. 1995 Dec;44(12):1707-11.
2
[Premedication in children--a clinical trial of bromazepam and chloral hydrate suppositories].
Masui. 1990 Jan;39(1):64-9.
3
[Comparative study of sublingual midazolam with oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia].[小儿麻醉前用药中舌下含服咪达唑仑与口服咪达唑仑的比较研究]
Masui. 2008 Oct;57(10):1227-32.
4
[Rectal premedication with midazolam in children. A comparative clinical study].[咪达唑仑用于儿童直肠术前用药的一项对比临床研究]
Anaesthesist. 1989 Jan;38(1):16-21.
5
[Rectal, oral and nasal premedication using midazolam in children aged 1-6 years. A comparative clinical study].[1-6岁儿童使用咪达唑仑进行直肠、口服和鼻腔术前用药。一项对比临床研究]
Anaesthesist. 1991 Dec;40(12):661-7.
6
[Amnesic effect of oral midazolam as premedication in children].
Masui. 1992 Jul;41(7):1109-12.
7
[Better acceptance of measures for induction of anesthesia after rectal premedication with midazolam in children. Comparison of results of an open and placebo-controlled study].
Anaesthesist. 1987 Nov;36(11):629-33.
8
Effect of drinks that are added as flavoring in oral midazolam premedication on sedation success.口服咪达唑仑术前用药中添加的调味饮料对镇静成功率的影响。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jun;18(6):494-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02462.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
9
Pediatric pharmacodynamics of midazolam oral syrup. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network.咪达唑仑口服糖浆的儿科药效学。儿科药理学研究单位网络。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jun;40(6):578-89.
10
A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.小儿麻醉前用药中鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服咪达唑仑的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929.