Hager W, Hasselhorn M, Hübner S
Institut für Psychologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1995 Oct;44(8):296-302.
For his training programs of inductive reasoning Klauer postulates a transfer effect to inductive thinking as well as to (performance in tests of) intelligence. As evidence for these claims, however, he uses the same data. That means the same tests are used to prove enhancement of inductive thinking and to prove transfer to performance in tests of intelligence. Moreover, Klauer's claim to train inductive thinking is criticized since better performances in at least some of the tests he administers can result due to enhancements in the area of visual perception. Finally, we ask what kind of effects the programs result in: Are they mere coaching effects or do the programs result in better performance due to enhanced competencies? The empirical evidence suggest that positive effects on inductive thinking do not last as long as perceptual competencies that are necessarily fostered when visual material is presented to children.
对于他的归纳推理训练项目,克劳尔假定其对归纳思维以及智力(测试中的表现)具有迁移效应。然而,作为这些主张的证据,他使用的是相同的数据。这意味着相同的测试既用于证明归纳思维的提升,也用于证明向智力测试表现的迁移。此外,克劳尔关于训练归纳思维的主张受到了批评,因为在他所进行的至少一些测试中,更好的表现可能是由于视觉感知领域的增强所致。最后,我们要问这些项目会产生什么样的效果:它们仅仅是辅导效果,还是由于能力增强而使项目带来更好的表现?实证证据表明,对归纳思维的积极影响不会像向儿童呈现视觉材料时必然培养出的感知能力那样持久。