Suppr超能文献

[归纳推理与智力测试表现——儿童两种思维训练方法的效果影响方式分析]

[Inductive reasoning and intelligence test performance--analysis of the manner of the effect of 2 thought training methods for children].

作者信息

Hager W, Hasselhorn M, Hübner S

机构信息

Institut für Psychologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1995 Oct;44(8):296-302.

PMID:8584512
Abstract

For his training programs of inductive reasoning Klauer postulates a transfer effect to inductive thinking as well as to (performance in tests of) intelligence. As evidence for these claims, however, he uses the same data. That means the same tests are used to prove enhancement of inductive thinking and to prove transfer to performance in tests of intelligence. Moreover, Klauer's claim to train inductive thinking is criticized since better performances in at least some of the tests he administers can result due to enhancements in the area of visual perception. Finally, we ask what kind of effects the programs result in: Are they mere coaching effects or do the programs result in better performance due to enhanced competencies? The empirical evidence suggest that positive effects on inductive thinking do not last as long as perceptual competencies that are necessarily fostered when visual material is presented to children.

摘要

对于他的归纳推理训练项目,克劳尔假定其对归纳思维以及智力(测试中的表现)具有迁移效应。然而,作为这些主张的证据,他使用的是相同的数据。这意味着相同的测试既用于证明归纳思维的提升,也用于证明向智力测试表现的迁移。此外,克劳尔关于训练归纳思维的主张受到了批评,因为在他所进行的至少一些测试中,更好的表现可能是由于视觉感知领域的增强所致。最后,我们要问这些项目会产生什么样的效果:它们仅仅是辅导效果,还是由于能力增强而使项目带来更好的表现?实证证据表明,对归纳思维的积极影响不会像向儿童呈现视觉材料时必然培养出的感知能力那样持久。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验