Suppr超能文献

经腹超声与经阴道超声在识别子宫内膜恶性肿瘤方面的比较。

Comparison between transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for identifying endometrial malignancies.

作者信息

Tsuda H, Kawabata M, Kawabata K, Yamamoto K, Hidaka A, Umesaki N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City General Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;40(4):271-3. doi: 10.1159/000292351.

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is generally considered superior to transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) in the estimation of endometrial abnormalities. A disadvantage of TVS is the limited field of view. The purpose of this study is a comparison between TAS and TVS for endometrial cancer screening. Ninety-one postmenopausal women were included. They were evaluated by TAS, TVS, and endometrial tissue sampling. The mean endometrial thickness estimated by TVS was larger than that obtained by TAS (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of TAS were 83.3 and 58.8% and of TVS 100 and 54.1%, respectively. We conclude that TVS might be superior to TAS, especially in patients with a retroflexed uterus.

摘要

在评估子宫内膜异常方面,经阴道超声(TVS)通常被认为优于经腹超声(TAS)。TVS的一个缺点是视野有限。本研究的目的是比较TAS和TVS在子宫内膜癌筛查中的效果。纳入了91名绝经后女性。她们接受了TAS、TVS和子宫内膜组织取样评估。TVS估计的平均子宫内膜厚度大于TAS测得的厚度(p < 0.0001)。TAS的敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和58.8%,TVS的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和54.1%。我们得出结论,TVS可能优于TAS,尤其是对于子宫后屈的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验