Brotherton P N, Rhodes A
Department of Zoology, Cambridge, U.K.
Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jan 22;263(1366):23-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0005.
The only widely accepted explanations for the evolution of monogamy in mammals have been based on the benefits of biparental care of offspring. This is probably because, unless biparental care is important, the most competitive males would be expected to monopolize more than one female. This study investigates whether males are important for offspring survival in a monogamous dwarf antelope, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii), by testing three hypotheses that have been proposed to account for monogamy in mammals. In dik-diks, males could help their mates and young by: (i) defending resources; (ii) defending against infanticide by other males; and (iii) reducing predation risk. Because territorial defence was mainly sex-specific, males did not defend resources for their mates or offspring. Males also made no attempt to kill infants they had not sired, so there is no risk of infanticide. Nor was there any evidence that males reduced predation risk: females were not alerted to an approaching predator sooner when males were present, and only mothers responded to playbacks of the call of a predator which preys on juvenile but not adult dik-diks. This is the first conclusive evidence of the absence of paternal care in any monogamous mammal.
哺乳动物中一夫一妻制进化的唯一被广泛接受的解释是基于双亲对后代的照顾所带来的益处。这可能是因为,除非双亲照顾很重要,否则最具竞争力的雄性预计会独占不止一只雌性。本研究通过检验为解释哺乳动物一夫一妻制而提出的三个假说,来调查在一夫一妻制的倭岩羊(柯氏犬羚,Madoqua kirkii)中雄性对于后代存活是否重要。在犬羚中,雄性可以通过以下方式帮助其配偶和幼崽:(i)保卫资源;(ii)抵御其他雄性的杀婴行为;(iii)降低被捕食风险。由于领地防御主要是性别特异性的,雄性不会为其配偶或后代保卫资源。雄性也不会试图杀死它们未生育的幼崽,所以不存在杀婴风险。也没有任何证据表明雄性降低了被捕食风险:当雄性在场时,雌性不会更快地察觉到接近的捕食者,并且只有母亲会对捕食幼年而非成年犬羚的捕食者的叫声回放做出反应。这是在任何一夫一妻制哺乳动物中不存在父性照顾的首个确凿证据。