Suppr超能文献

[内科中专家系统的应用。快速医学参考的性能与可靠性分析]

[Use of expert systems in internal medicine. Analysis of performance and reliability of the Quick Medical Reference].

作者信息

Caratozzolo V

机构信息

Istituto di Clinica Medica II, Università La Sapienza, Roma.

出版信息

Recenti Prog Med. 1995 Dec;86(12):492-5.

PMID:8588081
Abstract

Here are reported the results of an analysis on the performance and the reliability of an expert system as a diagnostic aid in internal medicine, the Quick Medical Reference (QMR). The QMR is able to suggest a list of differential diagnoses elaborated on the basis of the clinical data available from patient's study cases. The study was performed on 27 clinicopathological cases published by the N Engl J Med in a consecutive series starting from 1993 until 1994. Each case was analyzed in three different phases in the attempt to simulate real life diagnostic procedure. In phase I only anamnestic and physical examination data were used, in phase II laboratory routine data, in phase III all the remaining clinical data. The QMR performance was evaluated by determining the frequency in which the "correct diagnosis" was given as highly probable by QMR in each of the three phases. At the end of phase III, the program suggested the correct diagnosis as the only one possible in 1 case. In 25 out of the 27 cases studied, the correct diagnosis was ranked within the first 5 positions, 14 out of 27 cases were listed as the most probable hypothesis. In 48% of the cases the program was able to give a diagnostic indication only on the basis of anamnestic and physical examination data. The program gave a poor performance only in those cases that were not well represented or the method used for the diagnostic procedure was not accurate.

摘要

本文报告了一项关于内科诊断辅助专家系统——快速医学参考(QMR)的性能和可靠性分析结果。QMR能够根据患者研究病例中可用的临床数据,给出一系列鉴别诊断结果。该研究对《新英格兰医学杂志》从1993年至1994年连续发表的27例临床病理病例进行。每个病例在三个不同阶段进行分析,以模拟现实生活中的诊断过程。在第一阶段,仅使用问诊和体格检查数据;在第二阶段,使用实验室常规数据;在第三阶段,使用所有其余临床数据。通过确定QMR在三个阶段中每个阶段将“正确诊断”列为高度可能的频率,来评估QMR的性能。在第三阶段结束时,该程序在1例病例中提示正确诊断为唯一可能的诊断。在所研究的27例病例中,有25例的正确诊断排名在前5位,27例中有14例被列为最可能的假设。在48%的病例中,该程序仅根据问诊和体格检查数据就能给出诊断提示。该程序仅在那些代表性不足的病例或诊断程序所使用的方法不准确的病例中表现不佳。

相似文献

3
Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems.
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1792-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302506.
7
[An expert system neurology--possibilities and limitations].
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006 Dec;74(12):723-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932168. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
8
[The evaluation of HepatoConsult, a hepatological expert system--the initial results and trends].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 Aug 27;124(34-35):989-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024462.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验