Arene I, Ahmed W, Fox M, Barr C E, Fisher K
Kalamazoo Center for Medical Studies, Michigan State University, USA.
MD Comput. 1998 Sep-Oct;15(5):323-6.
To determine whether the Quick Medical Reference (QMR) program can improve diagnosis or enhance learning among internal medicine residents, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of the program with that of residents at various training levels. The cases were from a prospective convenience sample of 40 patients admitted by 10 first-year residents (interns) and two chief medical residents. Four sets of differential diagnoses were created for each case--the first set by an intern, the second set by a chief resident, and the third and fourth sets by QMR, using the findings of the interns and chief residents, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the interns and chief residents was significantly greater than that of QMR. However, the chief residents indicated that QMR did increase their understanding of disease processes and offered educational value.
为了确定快速医学参考(QMR)程序能否提高内科住院医师的诊断能力或促进其学习,我们将该程序的诊断准确性与不同培训水平的住院医师的诊断准确性进行了比较。病例来自10名第一年住院医师(实习生)和2名主任医师收治的40例患者的前瞻性便利样本。针对每个病例创建了四组鉴别诊断——第一组由一名实习生创建,第二组由一名主任医师创建,第三组和第四组分别由QMR根据实习生和主任医师的检查结果创建。实习生和主任医师的诊断准确性显著高于QMR。然而,主任医师表示,QMR确实增强了他们对疾病过程的理解,并具有教育价值。