Suppr超能文献

血液透析期间的跨腔室尿素清除率是一个灌注指标吗?两种尿素池动力学模型的比较。

Is intercompartmental urea clearance during hemodialysis a perfusion term? A comparison of two pool urea kinetic models.

作者信息

Schneditz D, Fariyike B, Osheroff R, Levin N W

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995 Nov;6(5):1360-70. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V651360.

Abstract

Analyses of intradialytic and postdialytic urea profiles call for models that consider delayed urea transfer from different parts of the body to the blood. There are two different approaches to the problem. In the classical cell membrane model it is assumed that the two compartments refer to the serial (s) arrangement of extracellular and intracellular volumes, whereas in the regional blood flow model the two compartments are identified as parallel (p) organ systems with high or low perfusion. In the cell membrane model, delayed urea removal from peripheral body compartments is governed by intercompartmental clearance (Kc) which is a function of cell membrane permeability, whereas in the regional blood flow model delayed urea removal is related to low perfusion (QL) of the large muscle/skin/bone compartment. Both models were compared in a set of 16 high-efficiency hemodialysis treatments. Modeled volumes (Vm,s = 31.2 +/- 9.5 L; Vm,p = 30.0 +/- 8.3 L) and modeled dose of hemodialysis (Kt/Vm,s = Kt/Vm,p = 1.12 +/- 0.33) were the same for both models. However, volumes modeled by either technique were significantly lower than anthropometric volumes (V alpha = 35.0 +/- 6.4 L). These data suggest that at this point the two models are experimentally indistinguishable. Moreover, the main system parameters of both models, Kc (0.54 +/- 0.16 L/min) and QL (0.63 +/- 0.15 L/min) showed a strong linear dependence (QL = 0.921 Kc + 0.139, r2 = 0.884), whereas no relation could be found between Kc and Vm. Therefore, delayed transport that has up to now been characterized by membrane permeability may also be explained by peripheral perfusion.

摘要

对透析期间和透析后尿素廓清情况的分析需要考虑到尿素从身体不同部位向血液中缓慢转移的模型。针对这个问题有两种不同的方法。在经典细胞膜模型中,假设两个腔室指的是细胞外液和细胞内液的串联(s)排列,而在区域血流模型中,两个腔室被确定为具有高灌注或低灌注的平行(p)器官系统。在细胞膜模型中,外周身体腔室中尿素的缓慢清除受跨腔室清除率(Kc)控制,Kc是细胞膜通透性的函数,而在区域血流模型中,尿素的缓慢清除与大肌肉/皮肤/骨骼腔室的低灌注(QL)有关。在一组16次高效血液透析治疗中对这两种模型进行了比较。两种模型的模拟容积(Vm,s = 31.2 +/- 9.5 L;Vm,p = 30.0 +/- 8.3 L)和模拟血液透析剂量(Kt/Vm,s = Kt/Vm,p = 1.12 +/- 0.33)相同。然而,用任何一种技术模拟的容积都显著低于人体测量容积(Vα = 35.0 +/- 6.4 L)。这些数据表明,此时这两种模型在实验上无法区分。此外,两种模型的主要系统参数,Kc(0.54 +/- 0.16 L/min)和QL(0.63 +/- 0.15 L/min)呈现出强烈的线性相关性(QL = 0.921 Kc + 0.139,r2 = 0.884),而在Kc和Vm之间未发现相关性。因此,迄今为止以膜通透性为特征的延迟转运也可以用外周灌注来解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验