Suppr超能文献

自付费用对健康维护组织中急诊科使用情况的影响。

Effect of a copayment on use of the emergency department in a health maintenance organization.

作者信息

Selby J V, Fireman B H, Swain B E

机构信息

Division of Research, Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 7;334(10):635-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603073341006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is frequent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO).

METHODS

We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and 1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the start of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their clinical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by the copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for age, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, with 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type of employer.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the number of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copayment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratum defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient visits by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presenting conditions classified as "always an emergency" was small and not significant. For conditions classified as "often an emergency". "sometimes not an emergency", or "often not an emergency", the declines in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistically significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the presenting condition. Although our ability to detect any adverse effects of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess adverse events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Among members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the use of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 15 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with conditions considered likely not to present an emergency.

摘要

背景

急诊科用于非急诊护理的情况频繁且费用高昂。我们研究了在一个团体模式的健康维护组织(HMO)中,自付费用对急诊科使用情况的影响。

方法

我们调查了1992年和1993年30276名研究开始时年龄在1至63岁之间、隶属于北加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团HMO的受试者的急诊科使用情况。我们评估了在引入使用急诊科需25至35美元自付费用前后,他们对各种HMO服务的使用情况及其临床结局。将这个自付费用组与两个随机选择的不受自付费用影响的对照组进行比较。一个对照组有60408名成员,在年龄、性别和居住地区方面与自付费用组匹配。第二个对照组有37539名成员,在这些因素以及雇主类型方面也与之匹配。

结果

在对年龄、性别、社会经济地位以及1992年急诊科使用情况进行调整后,1993年自付费用组的就诊次数下降幅度比任何一个对照组都高出14.6个百分点(每次比较P<0.001)。在按年龄和性别划分的任何阶层中,因紧急护理而就诊的情况均未增加,成人和儿童的门诊就诊次数也未增加。对于归类为“始终属于急诊”的就诊情况,急诊就诊次数的下降幅度较小且无统计学意义。对于归类为“经常属于急诊”“有时不属于急诊”或“经常不属于急诊”的情况,急诊科使用次数的下降幅度更大且具有统计学意义,并且随着就诊病情严重程度的降低而增加。尽管我们检测自付费用任何不良影响的能力有限,但自付费用组没有出现不良事件增多的迹象,如死亡率上升或潜在可避免住院次数增加。

结论

在HMO成员中,引入少量使用急诊科的自付费用与该科室使用次数下降约15%相关,主要是在那些被认为不太可能属于急诊情况的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验