Tröger U, Martens J, Meyer F P, Hoffmann A, Terhaag B
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1995 Dec;45(12):1266-70.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of an oral formulation of nifedipine (CAS 21829-25-4, Corinfar, test preparation T a dragee with 10 mg nifedipine) were compared with a reference preparation (R, a sustained release tablet with 20 mg nifedipine) in 16 healthy volunteers in a open two-way crossover study under the influence of ingestion of food. A GC/MS method was used to analyse the serum samples. The estimation of bioequivalence was based on a nonparametric statistical procedure of analysis of variance. Both, the test preparation T and the reference preparation R are bioequivalent at steady state. The main pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- standard deviation) used for the bioequivalence decision at steady state were AUC0- tau ss (T: 351.4 +/- 161.0 ng.ml-1.h; R: 345.5 +/- 146.8 ng.ml-1.h), Cmaxss (T: 67.3 +/- 29.5 ng.ml-1; 66.9 +/- 33.0 ng.ml-1) and HVDss (T: 3.8 +/- 1.3 h; R: 4.2 +/- 1.8 h). The bioequivalence of rate and extent of absorption was proved for both preparations at steady state by assessing mean serum level curves as well as by statistics (90% confidence intervals) using the main pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0 - tau ss (range: 0.84-1.02 point estimator: 0.92), Cmaxss (0.95-1.33; 1.15) HVDss (0.72-0.98; 0.82). The large interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics is typical of the drug and does not depend on the formulation used. No case of severe disturbance of circulatory function or other adverse events with the duty to treat occurred during the study. No volunteer dropped out.
在16名健康志愿者中,于进食影响下进行了一项开放的双向交叉研究,比较了硝苯地平口服制剂(CAS 21829-25-4,可立平,含10 mg硝苯地平的受试制剂T,糖衣片)与参比制剂(R,含20 mg硝苯地平的缓释片)的药代动力学参数。采用气相色谱/质谱联用(GC/MS)方法分析血清样本。生物等效性评估基于非参数方差分析统计程序。受试制剂T和参比制剂R在稳态时生物等效。用于稳态生物等效性判定的主要药代动力学参数(均值±标准差)为AUC0 - tau ss(T:351.4±161.0 ng·ml-1·h;R:345.5±146.8 ng·ml-1·h)、Cmaxss(T:67.3±29.5 ng·ml-1;R:66.9±33.0 ng·ml-1)和HVDss(T:3.8±1.3 h;R:4.2±1.8 h)。通过评估平均血清水平曲线以及使用主要药代动力学参数AUC0 - tau ss(范围:0.84 - 1.02,点估计值:0.92)、Cmaxss(0.95 - 1.33;1.15)、HVDss(0.72 - 0.98;0.82)进行统计(90%置信区间),证实了两种制剂在稳态时吸收速率和程度的生物等效性。药代动力学的个体间差异较大是该药物的典型特征,且不取决于所用剂型。研究期间未发生需要治疗的严重循环功能紊乱或其他不良事件。无志愿者退出。