Suppr超能文献

低分子量肝素治疗冠状动脉疾病不稳定期,冠状动脉疾病不稳定期使用法安明(FRISC)研究组

Low-molecular-weight heparin during instability in coronary artery disease, Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) study group.

出版信息

Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):561-8.

PMID:8596317
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intravenous heparin is at least as effective as aspirin in preventing new cardiac events after an episode of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD), though the benefits are short-lived. Low-molecular-weight heparin has similar antithrombotic properties but can be given subcutaneously and is therefore suitable for long-term treatment. We have investigated whether subcutaneous low- molecular-weight heparin, in addition to aspirin and antianginal drugs, is protective against new cardiac events in unstable CAD.

METHODS

1506 patients with unstable CAD (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) took part in a double-blind trial and were randomly assigned subcutaneous dalteparin (Fragmin; 120 IU per kg bodyweight [maximum 10 000 IU] twice daily for 6 days then 7500 IU once daily for the next 35-45 days) or placebo injections. The primary endpoint was the rate of death and new myocardial infarction during the first 6 days. Secondary endpoints were the rates of death and new myocardial infarction after 40 and 150 days, the frequency of revascularisation procedures and need for heparin infusion, and a composite endpoint.

FINDINGS

During the first 6 days the rate of death and new myocardial infarction was lower in the dalteparin group than in the placebo group (13 [1.8%] vs 36 [4.8%]; risk ratio 0.37 [95% CI 0.20-0.68]), as were the frequencies of need for intravenous heparin (28 [3.8%] vs 58 [7.7%]; 0.49 [0.32- 0.75]) and need for revascularisation (3 [0.4%] vs 9 [1.2%]; 0.33 [0.10-1.10]). The composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, intravenous heparin) also showed a significant difference in favour of dalteparin (40 [5.4%] vs 78 [10.3%]; 0.52 [0.37-0.75]). At 40 days the differences in rates of death and myocardial infarction and the composite endpoint persisted, although subgroup analysis showed that the effect was confined to non-smokers (80% of sample). Survival analysis showed a risk of reactivation and reinfarction when the dose was decreased, more pronounced in smokers. 4-5 months after the end of treatment, there were no significant differences in the rates of death, new myocardial infarction, or revascularisation. The regimen was safe and compliance was adequate.

INTERPRETATION

We recommend that treatment with a combination of dalteparin and aspirin for at least 6 days should be considered in patients with unstable CAD to reduce the risk of new cardiac events and to allow time for risk stratification and selection of a long-term treatment strategy. Long-term dalteparin treatment instead of or in addition to early invasive procedures warrants further assessment.

摘要

背景

静脉注射肝素在预防不稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)发作后的新心脏事件方面至少与阿司匹林一样有效,尽管益处是短暂的。低分子量肝素具有类似的抗血栓形成特性,但可以皮下给药,因此适合长期治疗。我们研究了除阿司匹林和抗心绞痛药物外,皮下注射低分子量肝素对不稳定型CAD患者预防新心脏事件是否具有保护作用。

方法

1506例不稳定型CAD患者(不稳定型心绞痛或非Q波心肌梗死)参加了一项双盲试验,并被随机分配接受皮下注射达肝素(法安明;每千克体重120 IU[最大10000 IU],每日两次,共6天,然后在接下来的35 - 45天内每日一次7500 IU)或安慰剂注射。主要终点是前6天内的死亡率和新心肌梗死发生率。次要终点是40天和150天后的死亡率和新心肌梗死发生率、血运重建手术频率和肝素输注需求,以及一个复合终点。

结果

在前6天内,达肝素组的死亡率和新心肌梗死发生率低于安慰剂组(13例[1.8%]对36例[4.8%];风险比0.37[95%可信区间0.20 - 0.68]),静脉注射肝素的需求频率(28例[3.8%]对58例[7.7%];0.49[0.32 - 0.75])和血运重建需求频率(3例[0.4%]对9例[1.2%];0.33[0.10 - 1.10])也是如此。复合终点(死亡、心肌梗死、血运重建、静脉注射肝素)也显示出有利于达肝素的显著差异(40例[5.4%]对78例[10.3%];0.52[0.37 - 0.75])。在40天时,死亡率、心肌梗死发生率和复合终点的差异仍然存在,尽管亚组分析表明该效应仅限于非吸烟者(样本的80%)。生存分析表明,当剂量降低时,有再发和再梗死的风险,在吸烟者中更明显。治疗结束后4 - 5个月,死亡率、新心肌梗死发生率或血运重建率没有显著差异。该方案安全且依从性良好。

解读

我们建议,对于不稳定型CAD患者,应考虑联合使用达肝素和阿司匹林治疗至少6天,以降低新心脏事件的风险,并为风险分层和选择长期治疗策略留出时间。长期使用达肝素治疗替代早期侵入性手术或作为其补充,值得进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验