Binder L S, Chapman D M
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso 79905, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;2(12):1098-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03156.x.
Qualitative research methodologies, though often used in other fields and in medical educational investigations. have not been used to study problems in emergency medicine (EM). These methodologies address qualitative data and provide a process of describing, interpreting, and explaining the dynamics of a population or phenomenon. The stages of a qualitative investigation include initial narrative description, interpretation, theory development, assessment of generalization, and evaluation. Important differences between this framework and those of quantitative research methods are described. These methods may be applied to systematic investigation of virtually any observable phenomenon or process in EM in which a better understanding of process would be valuable, such as patient flow, patient satisfaction issues, patient turnover and sign-out processes, bedside teaching, EM teamwork dynamics, and development of the career interests of students and residents. As with quantitative research, EM academicians should seek collaboration and appropriate training with guidance by established qualitative investigators when applying these methods.
定性研究方法虽然常用于其他领域以及医学教育研究中,但尚未被用于研究急诊医学(EM)中的问题。这些方法处理定性数据,并提供一个描述、解释和说明人群或现象动态的过程。定性研究的阶段包括初始叙述性描述、解释、理论发展、普遍性评估和评价。文中描述了该框架与定量研究方法框架之间的重要差异。这些方法可应用于对急诊医学中几乎任何可观察到的现象或过程进行系统研究,在这些研究中,更好地理解过程将是有价值的,例如患者流程、患者满意度问题、患者周转和交班过程、床边教学、急诊医学团队合作动态以及学生和住院医师职业兴趣的发展。与定量研究一样,急诊医学领域的学者在应用这些方法时,应寻求与经验丰富的定性研究人员合作,并在其指导下接受适当的培训。