Kanter-Lewensohn L, Hellström-Lindberg E, Kock Y, Elmhorn-Rosenborg A, Ost A
Department of Pathology, Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Eur J Haematol. 1996 Mar;56(3):124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1996.tb01330.x.
In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), expression of the hematopoietic stem cell marker CD34 has been associated with a poorer prognosis. CD34 is usually analyzed by flow cytometry (FC), but may also be analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IH). The present study was undertaken to compare these 2 methods. Bone marrow from 16 patients with MDS and 12 with AML and from 12 healthy young volunteers was studied. The expression of CD34 was analyzed with FC on fresh bone marrow cells and with IH on sections of paraffin-embedded bone marrow. The correlation between FC and IH was good both for patients with MDS (p<0.0001) and AML (p<0.01). However, in patients with a high number of CD34-positive cells, the FC method seemed to result in a higher percentage of positive cells compared to the IH method. In normal bone marrow, the ratio between the percentage of CD34-positive cells and the percentage of bone marrow blasts was approximately 0.8. In the whole group of MDS patients, this ratio was 1:1, while in patients with refractory anemia (RA) and ring sideroblastic anemia (RAS) it was 1.6. Patients with MDS differed significantly from patients with de novo AML, who showed a ratio of only 0.23 (p<0.01). We conclude that the FC and IH methods for measuring expression of CD34 are well-correlated in MDS and reasonably well correlated in AML. A stem cell phenotype is more commonly expressed on precursor cells from patients with MDS than from patients with AML.
在骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中,造血干细胞标志物CD34的表达与较差的预后相关。CD34通常通过流式细胞术(FC)进行分析,但也可使用免疫组织化学(IH)进行分析。本研究旨在比较这两种方法。对16例MDS患者、12例AML患者以及12名健康年轻志愿者的骨髓进行了研究。采用FC分析新鲜骨髓细胞中CD34的表达,采用IH分析石蜡包埋骨髓切片中CD34的表达。MDS患者(p<0.0001)和AML患者(p<0.01)中,FC与IH之间的相关性均良好。然而,在CD34阳性细胞数量较多的患者中,与IH方法相比,FC方法似乎导致阳性细胞的百分比更高。在正常骨髓中,CD34阳性细胞百分比与骨髓原始细胞百分比的比值约为0.8。在整个MDS患者组中,该比值为1:1,而在难治性贫血(RA)和环形铁粒幼细胞性贫血(RAS)患者中为1.6。MDS患者与初发AML患者有显著差异,后者的比值仅为0.23(p<0.01)。我们得出结论,测量CD34表达的FC和IH方法在MDS中相关性良好,在AML中相关性也较好。与AML患者相比,MDS患者的前体细胞更常表达干细胞表型。