Ross C, Henneberg M
Department of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995 Dec;98(4):575-93. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330980413.
Comparative work among nonhominid primates has demonstrated that the basicranium becomes more flexed with increasing brain size relative to basicranial length and as the upper and lower face become more ventrally deflected (Ross and Ravosa [1993] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91:305-324). In order to determine whether modern humans and fossil hominids follow these trends, the cranial base angle (measure of basicranial flexion), angle of facial kyphosis, and angle of orbital axis orientation were measured from computed tomography (CT) scans of fossil hominids (Sts 5, MLD 37/38, OH9, Kabwe) and lateral radiographs of 99 extant humans. Brain size relative to basicranial length was calculated from measures of neurocranial volume and basicranial length taken from original skulls, radiographs, CT scans, and the literature. Results of bivariate correlation analyses revealed that among modern humans basicranial flexion and brain size/basicranial length are not significantly correlated, nor are the angles of orbital axis orientation and facial kyphosis. However, basicranial flexion and orbit orientation are significantly positively correlated among the humans sampled, as are basicranial flexion and the angle of facial kyphosis. Relative to the comparative sample from Ross and Ravosa (1993), all hominids have more flexed basicrania than other primates: Archaic Homo sapiens, Homo erectus, and Australopithecus africanus do not differ significantly from Modern Homo sapiens in their degree of basicranial flexion, although they differ widely in their relative brain size. Comparison of the hominid values with those predicted by the nonhominid reduced major-axis equations reveal that, for their brain size/basicranial length, Archaic and Modern Homo sapiens have less flexed basicrania than predicted. H. erectus and A. africanus have the degree of basicranial flexion predicted by the nonhominid reduced major-axis equation. Modern humans have more ventrally deflected orbits than all other primates and, for their degree of basicranial flexion, have more ventrally deflected orbits than predicted by the regression equations for hominoids. All hominoids have more ventrally deflected orbital axes relative to their palate orientation than other primates. It is argued that hominids do not strictly obey the trend for basicranial flexion to increase with increasing relative brain size because of constraints on the amount of flexion that do not allow it to decrease much below 90 degrees. Therefore, if basicranial flexion is a mechanism for accommodating an expanding brain among non-hominid primates, other mechanisms must be at work among hominids.
对非人类灵长类动物的比较研究表明,相对于颅底长度,随着脑容量的增加,以及上、下脸部更向下偏转,颅底会变得更加弯曲(罗斯和拉沃萨[1993]《美国体质人类学杂志》91:305 - 324)。为了确定现代人类和化石类人猿是否遵循这些趋势,从化石类人猿(斯泰克方丹5号、MLD 37/38、奥杜威9号、卡布韦)的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像以及99名现存人类的侧位X光片中测量了颅底角(颅底弯曲度的测量指标)、面部脊柱后凸角和眶轴方向角。根据从原始头骨、X光片、CT扫描以及文献中获取的神经颅容量和颅底长度测量值,计算出相对于颅底长度的脑容量。双变量相关性分析结果显示,在现代人类中,颅底弯曲度与脑容量/颅底长度之间没有显著相关性,眶轴方向角和面部脊柱后凸角之间也没有显著相关性。然而,在抽样的人类中,颅底弯曲度与眶轴方向呈显著正相关,颅底弯曲度与面部脊柱后凸角也呈显著正相关。相对于罗斯和拉沃萨(1993)的比较样本,所有类人猿的颅底都比其他灵长类动物更弯曲:古人类、直立人和非洲南方古猿在颅底弯曲程度上与现代人类没有显著差异,尽管它们的相对脑容量差异很大。将类人猿的值与非人类简化主轴方程预测的值进行比较发现,就其脑容量/颅底长度而言,古人类和现代人类的颅底弯曲度比预测值小。直立人和非洲南方古猿的颅底弯曲程度符合非人类简化主轴方程的预测。现代人类的眼眶比所有其他灵长类动物更向下偏转,就其颅底弯曲程度而言,其眼眶向下偏转程度比类人猿回归方程预测的值更大。所有类人猿相对于其腭部方向的眶轴都比其他灵长类动物更向下偏转。有人认为,类人猿并不严格遵循颅底弯曲度随相对脑容量增加而增加的趋势,因为弯曲度的限制不允许其大幅降至90度以下。因此,如果颅底弯曲是一种在非人类灵长类动物中适应脑容量扩大的机制,那么在类人猿中一定有其他机制在起作用。